About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (September 24, 2018)

handle is hein.crs/govchvx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




01;0


                                                                                     Updated September 24, 2018

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Errors and Fraud


The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is
the nation's largest domestic food assistance program,
serving over 42.1 million individuals in an average month
at a federal cost over $68 billion in FY2017. SNAP benefits
may be used to buy eligible food at over 263,000 authorized
stores. SNAP is jointly administered by state agencies,
which handle recipient functions, and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS),
which supports and oversees the states and handles retailer
functions. Policymakers discuss and debate errors and fraud
in SNAP; these can be complex concepts. This In Focus
summarizes the more-detailed CRS Report R45147, Errors
and Fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP).


Error and fraud can be organized into four main types:

  1. Trafficking SNAP benefits-the illicit sale of
     SNAP benefits, which can involve both
     retailers and recipients (a type of fraud).
  2. SNAP retailer application fraud-an
     ineligible store or owner's illicit attempt to
     participate in SNAP.
  3. Errors and fraud by households applying for
     SNAP-unintentional or intentional recipient
     actions resulting in incorrect SNAP amounts.
  4. Errors and fraud by SNAP state agencies-
     unintentional or intentional state agency
     actions resulting in incorrect SNAP amounts.

Errors are not the same as fraud. Fraud is intentional
activity that breaks federal and/or state laws, while errors
are mistakes. Certain acts, such as trafficking, are always
considered fraud, but other acts, such as duplicate
enrollment, may be either errors or fraud depending on the
circumstances of the case. SNAP fraud is rare, according to
all available data and reports, but there is no single data
point that reflects all the forms of fraud in SNAP. Criminal
prosecution of fraud, when pursued, is typically initiated by
USDA Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG) or
state law enforcement authorities.
Measu, esof E   , ,,'  a   Fra, d in SNAP
There are two main measures of error and fraud in SNAP.
The.z Na, tkinad P.    E,,:'r,-ow Rak'e (MPER)
Based on annual SNAP Quality Control reviews, the NPER
measures states' improper issuance of SNAP benefits,
including from recipient fraud, recipient errors, and state
agency errors. This rate reflects all overpayments and
underpayments that exceed the error tolerance threshold
($38 as of FY2017; per month in the sample month
counted; threshold is inflation-adjusted annually per


statute). This rate is not a measure of fraud. See Table 1 for
recent rates and amounts. USDA-FNS developed new
controls for FY2017 data collection that were not in place
in FY2014. The substantial increase to error rates in
FY2017 may be misleading since FY2014 rates were
estimated under different procedures.

Table I. Estimated SNAP Payment Error Rates and
Dollar Amounts, FY2012-FY2014, FY2017
Estimated overpayment and underpayment amounts in billions

                 FY2012   FY2013    FY2014    FY2017

 Overpay Rate    2.77%    2.61%     2.96%     5.19%
 Overpay         $2.07    $2.00     $2.07     $3.30
 Amount
 Underpay Rate   0.65%    0.60%     0.69%     1.1 1%
 Underpay        $0.49    $0.46     $0.48     $0.71
 Amount
 NPER            3.42%    3.20%     3.66%     6.30%
 Source: USDA-FNS Quality Control resources. Rates compare
 overpayment/underpayment amounts to total SNAP benefits issued.
 National rates were not issued for FY2015 or FY201 6.
 Th ,,,                              it ,
 Roughly every three years, the retailer trafficking rate
 estimates the volume of benefits trafficked. The retailer
trafficking rate reflects a major form of SNAP fraud, but it
does not reflect all forms of fraud. See Table 2 for recent
rates and amounts.

Table 2. Estimated National Retailer Trafficking Rates
and Dollar Amounts, FY2009-FY2014
          Estimated trafficked amounts in billions

                    FY2009-FY201 I    FY2012-FY2014
Trafficking Rate         1.34%              1.50%
Trafficking Amount       $0.86             $1.08
Source: USDA-FNS trafficking studies. Rate compares estimated
trafficking amounts to all SNAP benefits redeemed.
T'raflldkh,n. SNAP B-e..ef-'.ts'
USDA-FNS is responsible for identifying stores engaged in
retailer trafficking-using transaction data analysis,
undercover investigations, and other tools-and punishing
store owners. Retailers found to have trafficked may be
subject to permanent disqualification from participation in
SNAP, fines, and other penalties. Recipient trafficking is
considered an intentional program violation, and state
agencies are responsible for identifying-using social
media monitoring, transaction data analysis, and other
tools-and punishing recipients who engage in this kind of


         p\w -- , gnom goo
mppm qq\
M             , q
'M             I
11LULANJILiM,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most