About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (November 23, 2016)

handle is hein.crs/govcewu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




FF.      '                   riE S-' $.  h ,i  ,


mppm qq\
         p\w -- , gmmw' go
                I
MM
11LULANJILiM,

    November 23, 2016


Oil and Natural Gas Industry Tax Preferences


Corporate income tax policy was an issue in the 2016
presidential campaign and is also expected to be taken up
by the 115th Congress. Debate has centered both on the tax
rate as well as the tax base. The issue with respect to the tax
rate is whether the current top federal corporate rate of 35%
is too high compared to that levied by other countries,
reducing the competitiveness of U.S. firms. However, some
say that the average effective federal corporate income tax
rate may be as low as19%-20% due to a variety of
specialized tax deductions and credits, known as tax
preferences. These tax preferences tend to reduce the tax
base for the firms that meet the qualifications to use them,
reducing their tax payments and yielding a lower effective
tax rate. Not all industries have access to the same set of tax
preferences, and, as a result, companies in different
industries, with the same net taxable income, might be
liable for different tax payments. The result is unequal
treatment under the tax law which can amount to a subsidy
for some firms in some industries.

The oil and natural gas industries have access to a variety of
favorable tax preferences which might reduce the industry's
overall tax burden. These tax preferences have been a target
for repeal by the Obama Administration since 2009, but
Congress has not acted on Administration proposals. In
many cases, the tax preferences proposed for repeal are
technical in nature, and have a long history in the oil
industry. In addition, some tax preferences are not equally
available to all firms in the industry. For example, in the oil
industry, percentage depletion allowances can be taken by
independent oil companies but not by the major oil
companies.

Ta    rr,-efrences
The enhanced oil recovery credit provides for a tax credit
of 15% of allowable costs associated with the use of oil
recovery technologies, including the injection of carbon
dioxide to supplement natural well pressure, which can
enhance production from older wells. The availability of the
credit depends on official guidance establishing that oil
prices are low during the previous calendar year as
defined in statute. While the credit was not available due to
high oil prices from tax years 2006 through 2015, low oil
prices in 2015 allow the full 15% credit to be used by oil
companies in tax year 2016.

The credit for oil and natural gas from marginal wells
was implemented as the result of a recommendation by the
National Petroleum Council in 1994. The purpose was to
keep low-production oil and natural gas wells in production
during periods of low prices for those fuels. For oil wells,
the credit of $3 per barrel applies to the first three barrels
produced per day by a well, yielding a maximum tax credit
of $9 per well, per day. For natural gas, the credit is set at
$0.50 per thousand cubic feet of natural gas production,


again with limits to the applicable volumes. However, in
the case of the marginal wells credit, unlike that of the
enhanced recovery credit, a determination was made that
market prices were not low enough during 2015 to activate
the credit.

While both the enhanced oil recovery credit and the credit
for oil and gas production from marginal wells might
provide some incentive to produce more oil when prices are
low, that result might have the effect of reducing the
pressure for prices to rise, which would provide greater
benefits for more oil producers.

The expensing of intangible drilling costs has been part of
the federal tax code since 1913. Current expensing from
income in the year incurred is preferred by industry because
it allows costs to be recouped more quickly. Intangible
drilling costs include the cost of items that have no salvage
value, but are necessary for the drilling of an exploratory
well, or to develop a well for production. Intangible drilling
expenses include a wide variety of activities and physical
supplies, including ground clearing, draining, surveying,
wages, repairs, supplies, drilling mud, chemicals, and
cement required to begin drilling, or to prepare a well for
development.

Under current law, full current year expensing of intangible
drilling costs is available only to independent oil producers.
Since 1986, the integrated oil companies have been able to
expense 70% of their intangible drilling cost and capitalize
the remaining 30% over a 60-month period. Eliminating
this provision could contribute to equalization of the tax
treatment of independent and major oil companies,
eliminating an incentive for smaller, independent oil firms
to engage in oil and natural gas exploration.

The tertiary injection deduction applies to well injections
above and beyond natural well pressure, or secondary
injection of water, and allows the expense associated with
these activities to be fully deducted in the current tax year.
The deduction includes costs associated with acquiring or
producing the injectant, as well as the costs associated with
injecting, re-injecting, and recovering the injected
materials. Carbon dioxide may be one of the materials
injected into wells. Oil firms must choose between using
this deduction or the enhanced oil recovery credit to avoid
duplicate expensing of the same costs.

The passive loss exception for working interests in oil
properties exempts investments in oil and natural gas
exploration and development from being categorized as a
passive income (or loss) with respect to the Tax Reform
Act of 1986. The passive loss exception permits the
deduction of losses accrued in oil and natural gas projects
against other active income earned without limitation. The


.O 'T

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most