About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (December 18, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/govbgwz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Changes to India's Citizenship Laws


            w - - , gn'a', Nom
               , q >
   rq\\
'S
a X
11LULANJILiN,


    December 18, 2019


In December 2019, India's Parliament passed, and its
President signed into law, the Citizenship Amendment Act
(CAA), 2019, altering the country's 1955 Citizenship Act.
For the first time in independent India's history, a religious
criterion has been added to the country's naturalization
process. The changes sparked significant controversy,
including large-scale and sometimes violent protests.
Opponents of the CAA warn that Prime Minister Narendra
Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP) are pursuing a Hindu majoritarian, anti-Muslim
agenda that threatens India's status as an officially secular
republic and violates international human rights norms. In
tandem with a National Register of Citizens (NRC) planned
by the federal government, the CAA may affect the status
of India's large Muslim minority of roughly 200 million.


India's population of more than 1.3 billion includes a Hindu
majority of about 80%, as well as a large Muslim minority
of above 14% (see Figure 1). Prime Minister Modi, a self-
avowed Hindu nationalist, took office in 2014 after his BJP
won the first outright majority in 30 years in the Lok Sabha
(the lower chamber of India's bicameral legislature). That
majority was expanded in May 2019 elections, providing an
apparent mandate for pursuing Hindu nationalist policy
goals. Among these were abrogation of Article 370 of the
Constitution, which provided special status to Jammu and
Kashmir, previously India's only Muslim-majority state
(announced in August 2019 and accomplished in October),
and construction of a Hindu temple at the Ayodhya site of a
historic mosque destroyed in 1992 (enabled by a long-
awaited September 2019 Supreme Court ruling).

    Figure I. Religious Demographics in India, 2011





                ):iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii \ ii   Christian  2.3%
                .............iiiiiiiiiiiiii ...  ° ' ° °
                ..... ..........::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..     o t   .
                  • .. .. .. ........... .



                      =====================   Sikh  1  7%

        Source: Census of India, 201 I
Hindu nationalists tend to view India's history as a series of
humiliations at the hands of foreign invaders (Mughal
Muslims and later British colonialists). As a consequence,
they have rejected the secularism propounded by founders
of the modern Indian state such as Jawaharlal Nehru and
Mohandas Gandhi. In 2019, many analysts contend that the
Modi-BJP government is responding to significantly slowed
economic growth by becoming even more reliant on


emotive, religious-based issues to consolidate political
support.


India's Citizenship Act of 1955 prohibited illegal
immigrants from becoming citizens. Among numerous
amendments to the act since 1955, none contained a
religious aspect. In 2015 and 2016, the Modi-BJP
government issued notifications that Hindus, Sikhs, Jams,
Buddhists, Parsis (Zoroastrians), and Christians (but not
Muslims) who came to India from Pakistan, Bangladesh, or
Afghanistan before 2015 would be exempted from laws
prohibiting citizenship for illegal immigrants. A Citizenship
Amendment Bill, meant to formalize these exemptions, was
introduced in July 2016, but was not voted upon until
January 2019, when it was passed by the Lok Sabha. The
bill was not taken up by the Rajya Sabha (Parliament's
upper chamber) following resistance from opposition
parties and street protests in India's northeastern states.

In December 2019, seven months after a sweeping
reelection that expanded the BJP's Lok Sabha majority and
improved its standing in the Rajya Sabha, the bill passed
311-80 in the former and 125-105 in the latter. Its key
provisions allowing immigrants of six religions from
three countries a path to citizenship while excluding
Muslims may violate certain Articles of the Indian
Constitution (see text box). The CAA was immediately
challenged in the Supreme Court by scores of petitioners,
but the Court has refused to issue a stay on implementation
and is deferring hearing petitions until January 22.

    Selected Articles of the Indian Constitution
  14. The State shall not deny to any person equality before the
  law or the equal protection of the laws withiin the territory of
  India.
  I5. The State siall not discriminate against any citizen on
  gounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, or any
  of them.

The government argues that the three specified countries
have a state religion (Islam), resulting in the persecution of
religious minorities. Proponents say that Muslims do not
face persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Afghanistan,
and that the CAA is constitutional because it addresses
migrants rather than Indian citizens. Yet it is not clear why
migrants from other neighboring countries with state (or
favored) religions, such as Sri Lanka (where Buddhism is
the official religion and Tamil Hindus face persecution) and
Burma (where Buddhism enjoys primacy and Rohingya
Muslims are persecuted), are excluded from a path to
citizenship. In addition, oppressed Muslim minority
communities such as Pakistan's Ahmadis and Shias enjoy
no protections under the CAA.


0

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most