About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (July 5, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/govbaav0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 















Federal Court Temporarily Blocks a Portion of

the Administration's Border Wall Funding



Updated July 5, 2019

UPDATE:   On June 28, 2019, the federal district court in California issued an injunction permanently
prohibiting the Trump Administration from using funds reprogrammed under Section 8005 of the 2019
Department of Defense Appropriations Act to pay for border barrier projects. While the district court's
preliminary injunction issued on May 24, 2019 applied only to a subset of the Administration's proposed
border barrier projects, the June 28 permanent injunction applies to all of the proposed projects that were
to be constructed with funds transferred under Section 8005. The Trump Administration appealed the
district court's permanent injunction to the US. Court ofAppeals for the Ninth Circuit and asked that
Court to stay the permanent injunction pending appeal. On July 3, the Ninth Circuit denied the
Administration's request for a stay.
Since the district court's May 24 preliminary injunction, both houses of Congress have continued to move
through the annual appropriations process. The House ofRepresentatives has passed its version of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2020 and is continuing to consider the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY 2020. The House version of the 2020 Defense Appropriations
Act contains a provision prohibiting the use offunds for the construction of border barriers, as does the
House committee version of the NDAA. Meanwhile, the Senate has passed its version of the NDAA for FY
2020, which does not appear to include such a prohibition.
The original post from June 17, 2019 is below.
In recent months, the Trump Administration has taken steps to secure additional funds to pay for the
construction of barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border, and various entities have brought suits challenging
the lawfulness of those actions. On May 24, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California issued a preliminary injunction in one lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, barring the
Administration from using funds reprogrammed under Section 8005 of the 2019 Department of Defense
Appropriations Act to pay for specified barrier construction proj ects in New Mexico and Arizona while
the lawsuit is pending. But the court declined to issue a preliminary injunction with respect to any
construction project not involved in that lawsuit (even if Section 8005 is used to fund the project) or to
opine on the lawfulness of the Trump Administration's other proposed funding sources.



                                                                Congressional Research Service
                                                                  https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                     LSB10310

 CRS Legal Sidebar
 Prepared for Members and
 Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most