About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (January 24, 2007)

handle is hein.crs/crsuntaaezi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                                 Order Code  RS22579
                                                                     January 24, 2007





          CRS Report for Congress



District of Columbia Representation: Effect on

                    House Apportionment

                              Royce  Crocker
     Specialist in American  National Government   (Elections, Survey
                  Research  and  Statistical Methodology)
                        Government and Finance

Summary


     Two  proposals (H.R. 328 and H.R. 492) have been introduced in the 110th
 Congress. Both provide for voting representation in the U.S. House of Representatives
 for the residents of the District of Columbia, but in, fundamentally, different ways. H.R.
 328, for purposes of voting representation, treats the District of Columbia as if it were
 a state; H.R. 492 adds the District's resident population to the state of Maryland for
 purposes of representation. Both proposals increase the size of the House to 437
 members from 435.  Both provide for a representative for D.C. residents (one via
 representation in a new Maryland seat). And both proposals would, essentially, provide
 an additional seat to the state of Utah over what it received in the 2002 apportionment.
 This report will be updated as conditions warrant.

 Background

    H.R. 328, the District of Columbia Fair and Equal House Voting Rights Act of 2007,
provides for a permanent increase in the size of the U.S. House of Representatives, from
435 seats to 437 seats. It specifies that one of the seats is to be allocated to the District
of Columbia while the other seat is to be assigned using the normal apportionment
formula allocation procedure, which presently would result in Utah adding a fourth seat.
In essence, H.R. 328 treats the District of Columbia as if it were a state for the purposes
of the allocation of House seats.

    H.R. 492, the District of Columbia Voting Rights Restoration Act of 2007, also
would permanently increase the size of the House to 437 seats. However, rather than
treating the District of Columbia as a separate entity, H.R. 492 provides that, for the
purposes of apportioning seats among the states, the District's population would be
allocated to the state of Maryland and one of the Maryland seats would contain the
District of Columbia. Under this proposal, District residents would receive representation
in the U.S. House of Representatives via a new Maryland representative. The other seat
would also go to Utah.



          Congressional Research Service w  The Library of Congress
                Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most