About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (February 19, 2002)

handle is hein.crs/crsuntaaati0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
      Order Code RS20712
Updated February 19, 2002


Charitable Choice and TANF

                  Vee Burke
       Domestic Social Policy Division


Summary


     A bipartisan group of Senators on February 8 introduced a measure (S. 1924) that
 the White House said represented an agreement to move a faith-based initiative out of
 the Senate. The House on July 19, 2001, passed legislation (H.R. 7) to expand
 charitable choice rules, which forbid discrimination on grounds of religion against a
 faith-based organization that seeks to provide federally funded services. However, no one
 has sponsored the House bill in the Senate because of controversy about it. S. 1924
 omits the most disputed provisions of H.R. 7, but seeks to assure equal treatment for
 nongovernmental providers of federally-funded social services. As passed by the
 House, the Charitable Choice Act of 2001 (Title II of H.R. 7) would apply its rules,
 which are significantly different from those in four existing charitable choice laws, to nine
 new program areas. Under charitable choice, if a state or other grantee decides to use
 a nongovernmental body to administer a benefit or service, it cannot discriminate against
 faith-based organizations that apply to do so, and the religious organization generally is
 forbidden to discriminate against a beneficiary on grounds of religion. A large group of
 religious, civil rights, civil liberties, and education organizations known as the Coalition
 against Religious Discrimination opposes expansion of charitable choice. On January 8,
 2002, a federal judge struck down as unconstitutional direct funding for a Wisconsin
 faith-based substance abuse treatment program (Faith Works) that she found was
 indoctrinating participants in religion. The judge said her decision did not deal with the
 constitutionality of the charitable choice section of the 1996 welfare law, which does not
 authorize direct funding of religious activities. For background and selected legal issues
 on public aid and faith-based organizations, see CRS Report RL31043. This report will
 be updated for developments.


     Charitable Choice Option in TANF Law. If a state chooses to administer and
provide TANF services or benefits through a contract with a nongovernmental entity or
to provide TANF recipients with certificates or vouchers redeemable with a private entity,
it must allow religious organizations to participate on the same basis as any other
nongovernmental provider without impairing the religious character of the organization
and without diminishing the religious freedom of TANF beneficiaries. The law (Section
104 of P.L. 104-193) imposes the following rules:


Congressional Research Service +* The Library of Congress


CRS Report for Congress

              Received through the CRS Web

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most