About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (August 21, 2001)

handle is hein.crs/crsuntaaahk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
    Order Code RS20868
Updated August 21, 2001


Employer Liability Provisions in Selected
               Patient Protection Bills

                        Angie A. Welborn
                        Legislative Attorney
                     American Law Division


Summary


     The liability of a self-insured employer in state court for group health plan related
 actions is generally preempted by ERISA. However, an employer who acts as the
 administrator of the health plan can be liable for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA.1
 Some federal courts have also found self-insured employers liable under theories of
 vicarious liability and direct negligence.2 The extent to which employers can be found
 liable in any of these situations varies depending on the employer's level of participation
 in the administration of the plan and the plan's decision making process regarding claims
 for benefits.
     In the various patient protection bills introduced in the 106th (H.R. 5628, S.Amdt.
 3694, H.R. 2990) and to date in the 107th (H.R. 526, H.R. 2315, H.R. 2563, S. 889, S.
 1052), Congress has attempted to address the issue of employer liability by limiting
 liability to certain persons or circumstances. This report provides an overview of the
 employer liability provisions of selected bills from the 106rh and 107rh Congress.


    In both the 106th and 107th Congress legislation has been introduced that would
amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to allow state or
federal causes of action against group health plans for personal injury or wrongful death.
Currently, ERISA preempts any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter
relate to any employee benefit plan...,,3 ERISA creates a civil enforcement scheme that


'See Hamilton v. Allen-Bradley Company, 217 F.3d 1321 (1Ith Cir. 2000).
2 Damon Henderson Taylor, ERISA Preemption: Will the Elimination of the ERISA Preemption
Clause Help or Harm America's Ability to Deal with Its Pending Health Care Crisis?, 14 J.L.
& Health 133, 160 (2000). See Cooney v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, 1992 WL
46381 (E.D. La.), Civ. A. No. 91-3870.
' 29 U.S.C. 1144. For a detailed discussion of ERISA preemption, see CRS Report 98-286,
ERISA 's Impact on Medical Malpractice and Negligence Claims Against Managed Care Plans,
                                                                 (continued...)


Congressional Research Service +. The Library of Congress


CRS Report for Congress

              Received through the CRS Web

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most