About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (November 29, 2016)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmbbza0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Defe   Congressional Research Service

   Ifo vrig the lative debate since 1914


Defense Primer: Strategic Nuclear Forces


November 29, 2016


The Nuclear Triad
Since the early 1960s the United States has maintained a
triad of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles. These include
long-range land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBMs), long-range submarine-launched ballistic missiles
(SLBMs), and long-range heavy bombers equipped to carry
nuclear-armed cruise missiles and nuclear-armed gravity
bombs. The number of nuclear warheads carried on these
delivery vehicles peaked in the late 1980s, at around 14,000
warheads. It has been declining ever since, both as the
United States complies with limits in U.S.-Russian arms
control agreements and as it has changed requirements after
the Cold War. At the present time, the United States is
reducing its forces to comply with the New START Treaty,
which entered into force in early 2011. Table 1 displays the
force structure that the United States plans to retain when
that treaty's limits become binding in February 2018.

Table I. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces Under New
START
                 Total        Deployed     Warheads
   System      Launchers     Launchers       (est.)a
 Minuteman        454            400          400
 III ICBM
 Trident (D-      280            240          1,090
 5) SLBM
 B-52
 Bobr              46            42            42
 bombers
 B-I
 Boe               20             18           18
 bombers
 Total            800            700          1,550
 Source: U.S. Department of Defense, Report on Plan to Implement
the Nuclear Force Reductions, Limitations, and Verification,
Washington, DC, April 8, 2014.

a.  The treaty attributes only one warhead to each deployed
    bomber, although they could carry up to 20 bombs or cruise
    missiles.

Rationale for the Triad
Early in the Cold War, the United States developed these
three types of nuclear delivery vehicles, in large part
because each of the military services wanted to play a role
in the U.S. nuclear arsenal. However, during the 1960s and
1970s, analysts developed a more reasoned rationale for the
nuclear triad. They argued that these different basing
modes had complementary strengths and weaknesses that
would enhance deterrence and discourage a Soviet first
strike. For example, ICBMs were believed to have the
accuracy and prompt responsiveness needed to attack
hardened targets such as Soviet command posts and ICBM
silos, SLBMs had the survivability needed to complicate
Soviet efforts to launch a disarming first strike and to


retaliate if such an attack were attempted, and heavy
bombers could be dispersed quickly and launched to
enhance their survivability, and they could be recalled to
their bases if a crisis did not escalate into conflict.

The Obama Administration indicated in the 2010 Nuclear
Posture Review (NPR) that the United States would retain a
triad of ICBMs, SLBMs, and heavy bombers as the United
States reduced its forces to the limits in the New START
Treaty. The NPR Report indicated that the unique
characteristics of each leg of the triad were important to the
goal of maintaining strategic stability at reduced numbers of
warheads:

    Strategic nuclear submarines (SSBNs) and the
    SLBMs they carry represent the most survivable
    leg of the U.S. nuclear Triad.... Single-warhead
    ICBMs contribute to stability, and like SLBMs are
    not vulnerable to air defenses. Unlike ICBMs and
    SLBMs, bombers can be visibly deployed forward,
    as a signal in crisis to strengthen deterrence of
    potential adversaries and assurance of allies and
    partners.
Moreover, the NPR noted that retaining sufficient force
structure in each leg to allow the ability to hedge effectively
by shifting weight from one Triad leg to another if
necessary due to unexpected technological problems or
operational vulnerabilities.

Current Forces and Modernization Plans
The United States is currently in the process of
recapitalizing each leg of its nuclear triad and refurbishing
many of the warheads carried by those systems.

ICBMs
The United States deployed 450 Minuteman III ICBMs at
three Air Force bases: F.E. Warren AFB in Wyoming,
Malmstrom AFB in Montana, and Minot AFB in North
Dakota. Each base houses 150 missiles. Under the New
START Treaty, the number of deployed ICBMs will
decline to 400, although the Air Force will retain all 450
silo launchers. While each Minuteman III missile originally
carried three warheads, each now carries a single warhead,
both to reduce U.S. forces to New START levels and to
adopt what is considered a more stabilizing posture.

Over the past 15 years, the Air Force pursued several
programs that were designed to improve the accuracy and
reliability of the Minuteman fleet and to, according to the
Air Force, support the operational capability of the
Minuteman ICBM through 2030. According to some
estimates, this effort will likely cost $6-$7 billion. In
addition, the Air Force analyzed alternative approaches to
replace the Minuteman III, which led to the start of the


www.crs.gov i 7-570

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most