About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (September 22, 2016)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmbbyq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         SCongressional Research Service
~~Info rming te Iceislative debate s n~ce 1914


                                                                                           September 22, 2016

Defense Primer: Planning, Programming, Budgeting and

Execution Process (PPBE)


Introduction
The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution
(PPBE) process is one leg of a triad that makes up the
Defense Acquisition System (DAS), and serves as the
primary mechanism for the Secretary of Defense to request,
allocate, track and expend funds within the Department of
Defense (DOD).

The other two components of the DAS are the Acquisition
process, which manages the development and procurement
of DOD systems, and the Joint Capability Integration
Development System (JCIDS), which is responsible for the
requirements process. PPBE comprises five different fiscal
year budget cycles at any given point in time (see Figure 1),
and is further complicated by numerous federal,
department, and agency-specific timelines, missions and
priorities.

In 1961, then-Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara
created the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System
(PPBS) to allocate DOD resources; the last revision to the
process took place in 2003 and was renamed PPBE. Since
then, the PPBE process has remained the system by which
DOD manages its funding.

On an annual basis, the military services (Army, Navy,
Marine Corps and Air Force) and defense agencies submit
to the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) a Program Objective
Memorandum (POM) that plans a five-year funding period.
The Deputy SECDEF (DEPSECDEF) manages the PPBE
on a day-to-day basis and provides overall leadership and
oversight. The annual PPBE process provides the overall
planning direction, develops the DOD POM, and creates a
Budget Estimate Submission (BES) for years one and two
of the POM.

Planning
The first phase of the PPBE is planning, which involves
reviewing all current policy documents and objectives to
ensure the resulting Defense Planning Guidance (DPG)
aligns with the President's and the SECDEF's policy goals.
The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) leads
the planning phase. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff (CJCS) also plays a significant role in accordance
with his 10 U.S.C. § 151 responsibilities as the principal
military advisor to the SECDEF. The CJCS's role is to
advise the SECDEF, be the joint warfighter advocate, and
prioritize requirements within warfare capability areas.
Documents such as the Quadrennial Defense Review, the
National Security Strategy and the National Military
Strategy provide input into the planning phase to try to
ensure that threats, long-term strategy, larger force


structure/readiness concerns and cost effectiveness are
addressed in the planning phase.

Programming
The Director of the Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation Office (CAPE) leads the second phase - the
programming phase, which begins with creation of the
POM. The POM describes the proposed budget for forces,
manpower, and funding. It also describes associated risks
where needs are not funded.

Once each military service submits to CAPE its requests in
the POM, CAPE forecasts the resource requirements of
each of the military services for the coming five years,
called the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP). This
phase analyzes for the SECDEF and the President the
anticipated effects of the POM on forces, manpower, and
funding in future years based on present-day decisions.

Budgeting
The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief
Financial Officer leads the budgeting phase in which the
military services complete their budget estimates for the
first year of the five-year POM. Under guidance from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Comptroller
reviews the budget submissions to ensure: appropriate
funding and fiscal controls, phasing of the effort over the
funding period, and whether it can be realistically executed
in the requested budget year. This phase includes a back-
and-forth dialogue between the Comptroller and the
military services to help inform the Comptroller's decision-
making as he or she constructs the unified defense budget.
Resource Management Decisions (RMDs), signed by the
SECDEF, document program and budget decisions. The
military services update their budgets to comply with
RMDs. The final product is submitted to OMB each
December for inclusion in the President's annual budget
request to Congress, which is usually released in February.
The RMD is the DOD's input to the Presidential Budget
Request (PBR).

Execution
The military services (and defense agencies) manage the
execution phase that spends funds. They also conduct
ongoing reviews, to determine two things:

    1. Whether the appropriated funds are being
        obligated and expended in accordance
        with the approved budget; and
    2. Whether the funds are achieving the
        desired effect.


www crs.gov 17-5700


S

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most