About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (June 22, 2005)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthabdkd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                                  Order Code RS22173
                                                                         June 22, 2005



 CRS Report for Congress

               Received through the CRS Web



             Detainees at Guantanamo Bay

                             Jennifer K. Elsea
                             Legislative Attorney
                          American Law Division

Summary


     After the U.S. Supreme Court held that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear legal
 challenges on behalf of more than 500 persons detained at the U.S. Naval Station in
 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in connection with the war against terrorism, the Pentagon
 established administrative hearings, called Combatant Status Review Tribunals
 (CSRTs), to allow the detainees to contest their status as enemy combatants. This report
 provides an overview of the CSRT procedures and summarizes court cases related to the
 detentions. The relevant Supreme Court rulings are discussed in CRS Report RS21884,
 The Supreme Court and Detainees in the War on Terrorism: Summary and Analysis.
 This report will be updated as events warrant.

    In Rasul v. Bush,124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004), a divided Supreme Court declared that a
state of war is not a blank check for the presidentand ruled that persons deemed enemy
combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a judge or other neutral
decision-maker. The decision reversed the holding of the Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit, which had agreed with the Bush Administration that no U.S. court has jurisdiction
to hear petitions for habeas corpus by or on behalf of the detainees because they are aliens
and are detained outside the sovereign territory of the United States. Lawyers have filed
more than a dozen petitions on behalf of some 60 detainees in the District Court for the
District of Columbia, where judges have reached opposing conclusions as to whether the
detainees have any enforceable rights to challenge their treatment and detention. Fifteen
of the detainees have been determined by the President to be subject to his military order
(MO) of November 13, 2001,1 making them eligible for trial by military commission.2
However, military commissions have been temporarily halted pending the results of legal
actions in the D.C. Circuit.




1 Order on Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War against Terrorism,
November 13, 2001, 66 Fed.Reg. 57,833 (2000)(hereinafter MO or military order).
2 For an analysis of the military commission rules, see CRS Report RL31600, The Department
of Defense Rules for Military Commissions: Analysis of Procedural Rules and Comparison with
Proposed Legislation and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

       Congressional Research Service +o The Library of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most