About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

[i] (September 16, 2014)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthaacul0001 and id is 1 raw text is: CRS Insights Considerations for Possible Authorization for Use of Military Force Against the Islamic State Matthew C. Weed, Analyst in Foreign Policy Legislation (mweeddcrsoc.goo, 7-4589) September~~ 1,24(I0147) The armed offensive of the Islamic State (IS, also known as ISIL or ISIS) in northern and western Iraq and northeastern Syria has raised sianific nt cnrns for the Middle Eastern governments and the United States. Since June, President Obama has ordered multiple deployments of U.S. troops to Iraq to provide security to diplomatic personnel and facilities, advise Iraqi security forces, and conduct intelligence gathering and reconnaissance. He has also ordered U.S. military airstrikes on IS forces in Iraq as part of at least four military operations since August 7. In a September 10, 2014, speech, the President also laid out plans for expanded use of military force against the Islamic State in Iraq and possibly Syria. Concerned with a perceived piecemeal build-up of troops, the President's plans for expanding uses of military force, the lack of opportunities for congressional consultation and oversight, and a possible expansion of the use of military force into Syria, several Members of Congress have expressed the view that continued use of military force against the Islamic State requires congressional authorization. Members differ on whether such authorization should be provided. Authority to Deploy Troops and Use Military Force Against the Islamic State Although the President in his nifiatins to Congress of deployments and airstrikes has relied upon his powers as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive under Article II of the Constitution, Obama Administration officials have that Lo enacted riz for use of military force (AUMFs) might apply to U.S. military strikes against the Islamic State. These two AUMFs, one in response to the September 11, 2001, terror attacks and targeting those responsible, and one to counter the threat posed by the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, might not be considered to authorize strikes against the Islamic State. If Congress decides the AUMFs do not cover such use of military force, it could consider the President as conducting military operations without congressional authorization, and could demand an end to hostilities or enact a new authorization to use military force against the Islamic State. Possible Elements of a New AUMF Targeting the Islamic State A new AUMF targeting the Islamic State could both authorize presidential use of military force beyond what is considered valid under the President's Article II war powers, and circumscribe and limit such use of force. Language in a new AUMF could either broaden the purpose of military force to include unspecified U.S. national security interests, or narrow the scope of authorization to specific objectives related to degrading or destroying the Islamic State. Congress could limit the AUMF's geographic scope, authorizing force only in Iraq where hostilities have taken place, or approve an expansion to Syria. With continued uncertainty surrounding the Iraqi government, Congress might include authorization to use U.S. Armed Forces in Iraq in furtherance of political stability objectives. Provisions in any AUMF targeting the Islamic State might address the possible effect that targeting the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq could have on the ongoing conflict in Syria. Other provisions might include the requirement that the President certify that use of military force pursuant to the authorization was necessary and no other course of action was available; * a provision requiring the President to submit a strategy for conducting the conflict with the Islamic State; a sunset provision, limiting the President's authority to a set period of time, possibly with the option of extension through a presidential certification process; the prohibition on the use of appropriated funds for the use of military force outside the parameters of the specified authorization; congressional notification and reporting requirements on a periodic or incident-specific basis;

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most