About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2021 - April 2022)

handle is hein.ali/seccontract0192 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                                 CONTRACTS 2D



Generally

D.Ariz.2021. Cit. generally in sup., cit. generally in cases cit. and quot. in sup. Undergraduate students
filed a class action against university after university instructed students to leave campus and to begin
attending class remotely during a pandemic, seeking a refund of, among other things, housing costs and
fees. This court denied in part university's motion to dismiss, holding that students stated a claim for
breach of contract against university based on costs for housing and fees for services that were not
actually provided. The court rejected university's argument that students' claims failed as a matter of
law because it was impossible for it to perform, reasoning that, even if the defense of impracticability of
performance  applied, the Restatement Second of Contracts recognized that it was generally appropriate
to allow a party who had performed to seek restitution. Hannibal-Fisher v. Grand Canyon University,
523 F.Supp.3d  1087, 1097.

D.D.C.2020.  Cit. generally in sup. United States sued former National Security Advisor, alleging,
among  other things, that defendant breached nondisclosure agreements with the government by
publishing his memoir before completing prepublication review and by disclosing classified
information. This court denied defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that plaintiff sufficiently alleged
that defendant violated his prepublication-review obligation by sharing his manuscript before the review
ended. The court explained that defendant was not required to have had a particular state of mind,
because contractual requirements imposed strict liability by default under federal common law, which
followed general principles of contract law set forth in the Restatement Second of Contracts. United
States v. Bolton, 496 F.Supp.3d 146, 153.

E.D.Pa.Bkrtcy.Ct.2021.  Cit. generally in ftn. Chapter 7 trustee of debtor's estate filed an adversary
proceeding against debtor and his wife, seeking to avoid as fraudulent debtor's transfer of his sole
interest in the real property where he and his wife resided to himself and wife jointly. This court denied
trustee's motion to enforce an alleged oral settlement between the parties after the parties were unable to
memorialize the settlement in a written agreement, and held that no contract was formed under the
Restatement Second  of Contracts, because the parties did not reach a meeting of the minds regarding a
material term of the purported settlement, namely, whether it provided for payment of debtor's
exemption  claim from the proceeds of the sale of the property. The court noted that Pennsylvania courts
regularly employed the Restatement Second of Contracts when resolving contract disputes. In re
Carbone, 626 B.R. 262, 266.

Cal.App.2021.  Cit. generally in disc. Widow brought a malpractice claim against attorney who had
represented her, alleging that defendant failed to ensure that her now-deceased husband signed a waiver
of legal representation before executing a prenuptial agreement with plainiff, resulting in the agreement
being unenforceable and plaintiff being forced to enter into an unfavorable settlement agreement with
decedent's children in subsequent probate litigation. The trial court entered judgment for defendant. This
court reversed, holding, inter alia, that decedent could not contravene the statutorily-required waiver by
ratifying the prenuptial agreement through his acknowledgment of it in testamentary documents. The
court noted that defendant looked to the Restatement Second of Contracts in arguing that decedent's
                             COPYRIGHT ©2022 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                            All rights reserved
                                     Printed in the United States of America
           For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most