About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (Spring 2024)

handle is hein.ali/resndjmts0048 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Spring 2024 Citations JUDGMENTS 2D Generally Conn.App.2002. Cit. generally in cases quot. in sup. and in ftn. Members of the public sued municipal corporation that owned a beach, alleging that defendant interfered with the public's right to freely access the beach by erecting a fence monitored by security and charging fees to enter and use the beach in violation of a 1953 judgment that third parties had obtained against defendant. Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of plaintiffs, ruling that the judgment, which concluded that the beach had been dedicated for public use, precluded defendant from restricting free public access and use of the beach. Affirming, this court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in exercising its equitable powers to protect the integrity of the judgment. In making its decision, the court noted that an action to enforce a prior judgment was the consequence of the doctrine of merger, and that Connecticut's res judicata rules were derived from the theory of merger set forth in the Restatement Second of Judgments. Tracey v. Miami Beach Association, 288 A.3d 629, 641, 642. D.C.App.2023. Cit. in case cit. in sup. Trustee of an art trust sought enforcement of a California state- court judgment that required gallery to return a contingent gift of artwork and cash to the trust after it failed to comply with the conditions of the gift. The trial court denied gallery's motion for relief from enforcement of a foreign judgment, in which it argued, among other things, that the California state court lacked jurisdiction to issue the order. This court affirmed, holding, inter alia, that it was required to give full faith and credit to the judgment, which had been affirmed by the California court of appeals. The court cited the Restatement of Judgments and the Restatement Second of Judgments in reasoning that it was precluded from scrutinizing the trial court's exercise of jurisdiction by the California court of appeals' affirmance of the judgment. Corcoran Gallery of Art v. Petty, 291 A.3d 217, 226. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Scope R.I.2023. Ch. 1 Scope Note quot. in case quot. in sup. Oil trader filed tax aggrievement actions, challenging state tax division's denial of its claim for refund of state fuel taxes assessed on its purchase COPYRIGHT (2024 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most