About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (Fall 2024)

handle is hein.ali/reconlw0163 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                             THE AMERICAN


                             LAW INSTITUTE



                                      Fall 2024 Citations



                          CONFLICT OF LAWS



Generally

Kan.App.2023.  Cit. generally in sup. After obtaining a Missouri judgment against debtor, who resided
with his wife in Missouri, creditor registered the judgment in Kansas and garnished the entire balance of
a bank account that debtor owned with his wife as tenants by the entirety. The trial court denied debtor
and wife's motion to quash the garnishment order and issued an order requiring creditor to repay half of
the balance of the bank account to wife. This court affirmed, holding that, under Kansas law, debtor and
wife's interest in the account was a joint tenancy, and only debtor's half of the account was subject to
garnishment. The court noted that it followed the Restatement First of Conflict of Laws when addressing
conflict-of-law issues, and explained that, under the Restatement and Kansas choice-of-law rules,
Kansas law applied. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Higdon, 536 P.3d 898, 906.



                                   CHAPTER 2. DOMICIL

                   TOPIC   3. ACQUISITION AND CHANGE OF DOMICIL

§ 15. Domicil of Choice

C.A.5, 2023. Cit. in sup. Insured organizer of a festival that was cancelled by city on account of a
pandemic  sued insurer for failing to defend it against an underlying class action brought by would-be
festival goers seeking a refund of their ticket purchases. The district court granted insurer's motion for
summary  judgment. This court remanded, holding that insured and insurer failed to present sufficient
evidence of the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. The court explained that, for diversity jurisdiction,
the court looked to citizenship at the time the complaint was filed, and that, while insured alleged the
company's  principal place of business, it failed to allege the citizenship of all of its members, as
required to determine the citizenship of a limited-liability company. The court cited Restatement First of
Conflict of Laws § 15 in noting that, for natural persons, citizenship for purposes of diversity
jurisdiction was determined by domicile, and that, for limited-liability companies, citizenship was
determined by the citizenship of all of its members. SXSW, L.L.C. v. Federal Insurance Company, 83
F.4th 405, 407.
                            COPYRIGHT (02024 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                         All rights reserved
                                   Printed in the United States of America
          For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most