About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

PRELIMINARY DRAFT 34, QUESTIONS SUGGESTED FOR DISC. [i] (October 30-31, 1930)

handle is hein.ali/reconlw0042 and id is 1 raw text is: The American Law Institute CONFLICT OF LAWS DRAFT No. 34 Questions Suggested for Discussion at the Conference of Bar Association Cooperating Committees Chicago, Illinois October 30 and 31, 1930 Discussion is not confined to the questions pre- sented here. You are earnestly requested to raise any further points which occur to you. Section 290. There is considerable authority against this; see Hervey v. Locomotive Works, 93 U. S. 664. This is believed to represent the prevailing and sound view, but the question should be considered. 'Section 315. The doctrine of this Section has been ably at- tacked; and compare Sections 317A and 318. There is difficulty in drawing the line between the legality and the administration of a trust. Is experience in practice in accordance with these Sections or to the contrary? Section 485. On this point there has been some difference of opinion. Professor Lorensen and the late Professor Barbour have published opposite views. The author- ities are represented by the cases of Mallette v. Scherrer, 164 Wis. 415; Fall v. Eastin, 215 U. S. 1.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most