About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

18 Constr. Litig. 1 (2008-2009)

handle is hein.aba/cstrul0018 and id is 1 raw text is: 













                                  Construction Litigation Committee

                                     www.abanet.org/Iitigation/committees/construction
                                                          Summer/Fall  2008 Vol. 18 No. 1




BThe   New AACEy Recommended Practice for

    Forensic Schedule Analysis (Part 1 of 2)

                        By  John  C. Livengood


John  C.      In July 2007, the Association for the
Livengood     Advancement  of Cost Engineering
              International (AACEI) published the
 first American effort at a how-to manual on Foren-
 sic Schedule Analysis, the Recommended Practice for
 Forensic Schedule Analysis (RP/FSA). The RP/FSA
 document is the result of four years of intense col-
 laborative activity involving dozens of experts and
 lawyers in the field.
   Forensic Schedule Delay Analysis is a separate
 but related discipline to typical schedule analysis.
 Typically, large construction projects and most major
 programs of all types use prospective (forward-


looking) scheduling to plan the work. In the case of
major construction projects, this can result in Criti-
cal Path Method (CPM) schedules that have tens of
thousands of activities, all with separate and indepen-
dent durations and logical relations to other activities.
Prospective schedule analysis has proven so effective
in assisting the administration of construction projects
that schedule expertise was also applied to retrospec-
tive analysis of planned and actual events on a con-
struction project. This retrospective analysis is used to
assist managers, and ultimately litigators, in identify-
ing delays, causes of delays, responsibility for delays,
                                Continued on page 10


Emails, E-Discovery, E-Gads!

The Landscape Has Changed

      By  Sarah  Michaels  Montgomery


The article Electronic Discovery in Construction
Litigation, published in July 1998, leads with the line
Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have
contemplated discovery of electronic data since 1970,
many lawyers are only now awakening to the benefits
and risks of such discovery in litigation.' Ten years later,
the statement remains largely true except for the fact that
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure now require parties
to engage in discussions regarding electronic discovery
(e-discovery), treating electronically stored information
(ESI) as evidence that must be preserved and produced


in civil litigation. This article briefly ad-
                                       Sarah Michaels
dresses the technical revolution occurring  Montgomery
in the construction industry and how,
in light of that revolution, e-discovery will increasingly
become a part of construction litigation.

The Construction Industry Is Going Digital
Construction projects generate a plethora of docu-
ments including architectural drawings, bids, sched-
ules, to change orders, to purchase orders, to field
                                 Continued on page 14


American Bar Association Section of Litigation

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most