33 Sw. U. L. Rev. 327 (2003-2004)
Forcing the Copyright Genie Back into the Bottle: Public Policy Implications of Copyright Extension Legislation

handle is hein.journals/swulr33 and id is 337 raw text is: FORCING THE COPYRIGHT GENIE BACK INTO THE BOTTLE: PUBLIC POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF COPYRIGHT EXTENSION LEGISLATION Cecil C. Kuhne, III* I. INTRODUCTION The United States Supreme Court has poignantly described copyright as the engine of free expression,' and as such the Copyright Clause of the Constitution' attempts to strike a careful balance between, on the one hand, providing financial incentives for copyright owners to create original works (by granting exclusive rights to them), and, on the other hand, allowing eventual public access to those works (by limiting the duration of the creators' exclusive rights).3 While the economic motivations for individual authors and artists are commonly asserted as a justification for the extension of copyright protection, the goal of a robust and constantly rejuvenated public domain4 is also, in the minds of most observers, crucial to the . Mr. Kuhne is counsel in the Dallas office of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. 1. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enter., 471 U.S. 539, 558 (1985). 2. The Patent and Copyright Clause of the Constitution provides that [t]he Congress shall have Power... [t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 8. 3. As the Supreme Court explained in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: The monopoly privileges that Congress may authorize are neither unlimited nor primarily designed to provide a special private benefit. Rather, the limited grant is a means by which an important public purpose may be achieved. It is intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors by the provision of a special reward, and to allow the public access to the products of their genius after the limited period of exclusive control has expired. 464 U.S. 417, 429 (1984). 4. The public domain consists of that repository of works which are ineligible for copyright, were created before copyright law existed, have had their copyrights expire, or have

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Purchase Access

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Request a Quote or Trial

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Login