94 U. Pa. L. Rev. 94 (1945-1946)
Story of the Mortgage Retold

handle is hein.journals/pnlr94 and id is 104 raw text is: THE STORY OF THE MORTGAGE RETOLD

In their History of English Law, Pollock and Maitland speak of
the Glanvillian and Bractonian mortgages as representing two dis-
tinct stages in the development of the English law of mortgages.1 On
the basis of an obscure passage in Glanvill they concluded that, at the
time when Glanvill's treatise was written, a forfeiture of gaged land by
the gagor, in case of failure on his part to pay the mortgage debt on the
due date, could be validly effected by an appropriate provision to that
effect in the mortgage agreement, and that in the absence of such a pro-
vision the gagee could enforce a forfeiture by a proceeding in court.
The Glanvillian mortgage was, according to Pollock and Maitland, one
in which a forfeiture was either expressed or implied, and in the latter
case the gagee had to have recourse to what we might call a foreclosure
proceeding in order to enforce a forfeiture. The Bractonian mort-
gage, they assert, took the form of a lease for a definite period of time,
with a provision that upon failure on the part of the gagor to pay the
debt at the end of the period fixed in the mortgage instrument the land
was to become the property of the gagee absolutely.
As to the classical English mortgage in the form of an absolute
conveyance with a condition subsequent, Pollock and Maitland are
apparently of the opinion that it came to the fore in the fourteenth cen-
tury only, by reason of the fact that the lawyers of that time found it
difficult to square the notion of a term of years swelling into a fee with
their ideas of seisin.2
The writer proposes to show that neither in the twelfth nor in the
thirteenth century could a forfeiture be effected either by agreement
between the parties or by a proceeding in court, as in the so-called Glan-
villian mortgage ; that a term of years could not be converted into a
fee by nonpayment of the mortgage debt, as in the so-called Bractonian
mortgage ; that Pollock and Maitland failed to take fully into account
a very potent influence upon the development of English law during the
period under discussion, namely the influence of Hebrew law and legal
t B. S., 1929, Columbia University; M. A., 1931, LL. B., 1937, New York Univer-
sity. Member of the New York Bar. Former member of the legal staff of the Depart-
ment of Investigation, City of New York. Author: Some Remarks on the Evasion of
the Usury Laws in the Middle Ages (1943) 37 HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEw 49;
The Origin of the Common Law Warranty of Real Property and of the Inchoate Right
of Dower (1944) 30 CORN. L. Q. 77; The Common Law Mortgage and the Conditional
Bond (1943) 92 U. OF PA. L. REv. 179.
2. 2 id. at 122-3.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?