31 Me. L. Rev. 17 (1979-1980)
Judicial Enforcement of the Federal Restraints on Alienation of Indian Land: The Origins of the Eastern Land Claims

handle is hein.journals/maine31 and id is 27 raw text is: JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE
Robert N. Clinton* and Margaret Tobey Hotoppt
The land claims of the Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Oneida, Mash-
pee, Narragansett, and other eastern Indian tribes' have recently
drawn attention to the federal statute governing alienation of tribal
lands upon which the claims are based-25 U.S.C. § 177.2 While the
* Professor, University of Iowa College of Law; B.A. 1968, University of Michigan,
J.D. 1971, University of Chicago. Member of the Illinois and Iowa bars.
t Law Student, University of Iowa College of Law; B.A. 1974, University of Iowa;
J.D. University of Iowa, expected 1980.
1. The major reported cases are Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 464
F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1972), rev'd, 414 U.S. 661 (1974), on remand, 434 F. Supp. 527
(N.D.N.Y. 1977); Mashpee Tribe v. Town of Mashpee, 447 F. Supp. 940 (D. Mass.
1978), aff'd sub nom. Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., 592 F.2d 575 (1st Cir.
1979), cert. denied, 48 U.S.L.W. 3221 (Oct. 2, 1979); Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury
Corp., 427 F. Supp. 899 (D. Mass. 1977); Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School
Corp., 423 F. Supp. 780 (D. Conn. 1976); Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern
R. I. Land Dev. Corp., 418 F. Supp. 798 (D.R.I. 1976); Joint Tribal Council of the
Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton, 388 F. Supp. 649 (D. Me. 1975), off'd, 528 F.2d 370
(1st Cir. 1975). Unreported cases include Western Pequot Tribe of Indians v. Holdridge
Enterprises, Inc., Civil No. 76-193 (D. Conn., filed 1976); Mohegan Tribe v. Connecti-
cut, Civ. No. H-77-434 (D. Conn., filed 1977); Epps v. Andrus, Civil No. 77-3739-S (D.
Mass., filed Dec. 26, 1974); Unitea States v. Maine, Civil Nos. 1966 and 1969 (D. Me.,
filed July 1, 1972); Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, No. 74-CIV-187
(N.D.N.Y., filed 1974); Oneida Indian Nation v. Williams, No. 74-CIV-167 (N.D.N.Y.,
filed 1974).
Claims asserted by the Cayuga Tribe to some 64,000 acres of land in upstate New
York have been tentatively settled although suit was never filed. Dept. of Interior News
Release for Indian Affairs (August 20, 1979).
The Solicitor of the Department of the Interior has ruled that the federal government
will not pursue a claim asserted by the Shinnecock Tribe to 3,158 acres in South
Hampton, New York. Dept. of Interior News Release (September 4, 1979). Finally, a
bill has been submitted to Congress to settle a claim made by the Catawba Tribe upon
which hearings have been held. H. R. 3274, 96th Cong., 1st Seas. (1979); see Washing-
ton Report, 5 AM. INDLAN J. 23-24 (July 1979).
2. No purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title
or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any
validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention
entered into pursuant to the Constitution. Every person who, not being
employed under the authority of the United States, attempts to negotiate
such treaty or convention, directly or indirectly, or to treat with any such
nation or tribe of Indians for the title or purchase of any lands by them held
or claimed, is liable to a penalty of $1,000. The agent of any State who may
be present at any treaty held with Indians under the authority of the United
States, in the presence and with the approbation of the commissioner of the

What Is HeinOnline?

With comprehensive coverage of government documents and more than 2,400 journals from inception on hundreds of subjects such as political science, criminal justice, and human rights, HeinOnline is an affordable option for colleges and universities. Documents have the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?