About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

20 Griffith L. Rev. 931 (2011)
Prosthetics of Law and the Anomic Violence of Drones

handle is hein.journals/griffith20 and id is 941 raw text is: PROSTHETICS OF LAW AND THE ANOMIC VIOLENCE OF DRONES Joseph Pugliese* This article examines the relationship between law and technology in the context of the use of drones by the United States in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. Specifically, I examine the relation of law to lethal unmanned aerial combat technologies (drones), which conduct war and killing at a distance, in the context of two seemingly opposed figures: the parenthetical and the prosthetic. The parenthetical relation of law to technology operates to suspend the relation between the executioner who manipulates the killing technology of the drone from the fact of the resultant execution. In this scenario, law is conceived of in the most radically instrumental of understandings: it enables and legitimates the execution while simultaneously suspending the connection between the doer and the deed. The prosthetic relation of law to technology is, conversely, premised on the indissociable articulation between technology and its seeming opposite: the biological human subject. Through a series of instrumental mediations, the biological human actor becomes coextensive with the drone that she or he pilots from the remote ground control station. I examine the use of drones by the United States in the context of the war on terror in order to bring into focus the mutation of robotic war into a type of normalised civic practice. I close the article by refocusing on the relation between law and technology, and in the process I attempt to extrapolate a general theory of law as prosthetic. The categories of 'law' and 'technology' would seem to be at once non- interchangeable and conceptually distinct. In reductive terms, law can be said simply to act instrumentally on its various technologised agents. In this essay, I problematise this dualistic understanding by theorising the relation of law and technology as indissociably prosthetic. My theorisation of law as prosthetic will be situated in the context of the use of unmanned aerial combat vehicles, such as Predator and Reaper drones, by the United States in its pursuit and extermination of so-called 'insurgents' and 'terror suspects'. Theorising law as prosthetic - that is, as inextricably entwined with technology from its originary enunciation through the technology of language - enables the disclosure of complex dynamics of power, disavowal and violence. Discipline Leader of Cultural Studies and Associate Professor in the Department of Media, Music, Communication and Cultural Studies, Macquarie University. My sincere thanks to Constance Owen for her generous, invaluable and tireless research assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most