15 Ga. L. Rev. 925 (1980-1981)
The Historical Development of the Fault Principle: A Reinterpretation

handle is hein.journals/geolr15 and id is 941 raw text is: THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
Robert L. Rabin*
Long ago a sturdy woodsman, swinging his axe with abandon,
felled a mighty oak in a distant corner of Tort Scholar Forest.
Without warning, the tree plummeted directly down upon a way-
ward traveler, causing him grievous injuries. Because our unfortu-
nate victim suffered direct harm from the overzealous activity of
the stalwart woodsman, he stood a good chance of recovering com-
pensation for the trespass upon his person. If, instead, the earth-
bound tree had landed in the traveler's path, leading his horse to
bolt in terror and cause him indirect injury, he would have
sought relief through a related form of action, trespass on the
case - assuming his injury came in the later, and more liberal,
phase of the pre-industrial era.1
Legal historians have labored over the sparse offerings of the
Yearbooks, attempting to establish definitively the strictness of
liability in those distant times - scrutinizing the cryptic opinions
for traces of a fault requirement in the early law of personal
harms.2 When all is said and done, however, the issue remains in
* Professor of Law, Stanford Law School. This research was supported by the Stanford
Legal Research Fund, made possible by a bequest from the Estate of Ira S. Lillick and by
gifts from Roderick E. and Carla A. Hills and other friends of the Stanford Law School. I
would like to thank Marc Franklin, Tom Grey, Mark Kelman, and Gary Schwartz for their
helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. I also benefited from the research assis-
tance of Lisa Landsverk.
' For a discussion of the development of the writs of trespass and case, see C. FIFOOT,
ACTION ON THE CASE (1951); Malone, Ruminations on the Role of Fault in the History of
the Common Law of Torts, 31 LA. L. REv. 1 (1970); Woodbine, The Origins of the Action of
Trespass (pts. 1-2), 33 YALE L.J. 799 (1924), 34 YALE L.J. 343 (1925).
2 See generally O.W. HOLMES, THE COMMON LAW 84-105 (1881); T. STREET, FOUNDATIONS
OF LEGAL LIABILITY: TORT (1906); Ames, Law and Morals, 22 HARV. L. REY. 97 (1908); Wig-
more, Responsibility for Tortious Acts: Its History (pts. 1-3), 7 HARv. L. REV. 315, 383, 441


What Is HeinOnline?

With comprehensive coverage of government documents and more than 2,400 journals from inception on hundreds of subjects such as political science, criminal justice, and human rights, HeinOnline is an affordable option for colleges and universities. Documents have the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?