About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 Complainants' Louisville Commission 1843

handle is hein.trials/aclj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: COMPLAINANTS' LOUISVILLE COMMISSION. Deposition of Witnesses produced, sworn and examined, on this eighteenth day of December, dnno Domini eighteen hundred and forty-three, at the banking house of the Bank of Kentucky, in the City of Louisville, in the State of Kentucky, by virtue of a commission issuing from the Court of Common Pleas for the County of Philadelphia to Garnett Duncan, directed for the examination of witnesses in a certain cause, depending in said Court, wherein the President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Kentucky are complainants, and the Schuyl- kill Bank in the City of Philadelphia, and others, defendants. William S. Waller, of Lexington, Kentucky, aged fifty-eight, and who has long been known to me, being produced and sworn on the Holy Evangelists to depose the truth, and the whole truth, to such interrogatories as may be propounded to him under said com- mission, and being by me carefully examined on behalf of the said complainants, deposeth and sayeth as follows: 1. To the first interrogatory on the part of the complainants, and attached to said commission, he answers as follows: He knows the complainants, and he knows Hosea J. Levis slightly, and he knows the President of the Schuylkill Bank. 2. To the second interrogatory, on the part of the complainants, he answers as follows: That he holds the office of Cashier of the Lexington Branch of the Bank of Kentucky, and has held that office ever since its establishment in July, 1835. 3. To the third interrogatory of complainants he answers as follows: That he has access to and control over the books and papers of the said Lexington Branch Bank, and that he has not, except occasionally, by courtesy, access to the books and papers of the prin- cipal bank, and that he has not the possession of the original book containing the by-laws of said bank. 4. To the interrogatory number four, on the part of the com- plainants and marked No. 4, he answers as follows: That he has no personal knowledge of the letter referred to in this interrogatory, and he has not the control of the books referring thereto. 5. To the fifth interrogatory on the part of the complainants he answers as follows: He has no personal knowledge of the second letter and the one referred to in said interrogatory, and he has no books or papers relating thereto. 6. To the sixth interrogatory on the part of the complainants he

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most