About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

2 Case, Josiah Wood, Jr. Plff. in Equity, vs. Samuel H. Mann, Jno. R. Adams, Elisha Fuller & Others, Defendants, in the Circuit Court of the United States, for the First Circuit & District of Massachusetts. Before the Honorable Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, and the Honorable John Davis, Justice of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Mass. 1836

handle is hein.trials/aawj0002 and id is 1 raw text is: DEPOSITION OF WITNESSES, PRODUCED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS. DEPOSITION OF JOHN W. COOLIDGE. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, District of Massachusetts, ss. IN CHANCERY, BETWEEN JOSIAH WOOD, JR. PLAINTIFF, AND SAMUEL H. MANN AND OTHERS, DEFTS. Deposition of John W. Coolidge, of Lowell, in the District of Massachusetts, a witness produced, sworn and examined, on the part of the defendants in the above entitled cause. I, John W. Coolidge, of Lowell, in the County of Middlesex, attorney at law, of lawful age to give testimony, having been duly examined, cautioned and sworn, to tell the whole truth, do testify, depose and say, in answer to the following interrogatories, put by FRANKLIN DEXTER, Esq., Solicitor and Counsel for Samuel H. Mann and others, defendants. Interrogatory 1st. Have you examined that part of your former deposition relating to the knowledge you had of the interview between said Mann and Flagg, stated to have taken place on the 13th of May, A. D. 1831 ? If yea, say whether the same is correct, or whether you can state the same more cor- rectly and at large ; and state as particularly as you can the conversation be- tween the parties, and your own means of observation, so far as the same is not fully or is incorrectly stated in said deposition, if at all. Answer. I have examined that part of my former deposition. My former evidence on the topics mentioned in the question, is correct, in general, but my answer to the first question proposed by the counsel for the defendants is wrong in this respect. I stated there that I was called from the adjoining room by Mr. Mann to witness the transaction before stated. I wish to state now, that although I so testified, and though my impressions are still strong that I was so called,' yet I have doubts whether I was not in the room during the whole transaction. I think I might have been in the room during the whole transaction, without being able to state what took place, excepting that to which my attention was particularly called. The room occupied by Mr. Mann in which the transaction 99

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most