About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Mr. Fairchild's Trial 1845

handle is hein.trials/aagh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: MI. TARCHILD'S TRIAL.
MUNICIPAL COURT.                pectability of the person accused. Indict-
-ments of this character are not indeed of un-
Monday, March 24.   frequent occurrence, as the records of this
At a quarter to'10 A. I., the north doors Court, and the printed decisions of the Su-
of the Court room were opened, and the space preme Court, attest; and in most of the rq.
outside -of the bar together with the gallery, cent prosecutions for this offence in this
Court, the parties accused have pleaded guil-
was immediately filled with a crowd of eager 7, and either forfeited the penalty ef their
spectators, who paid but little deference to recognizances, or quietly submitted to the
order in gaining their entrance. The South punishment of the law. But we are now as-.
doors continued cosed, except for the admis     d forthe solemn trial of an issue, in
which,the accused denies his guilt;, and we
si(n of jurors, witnesses and officers of' ihe wir to proceed throigh a most painful iqree-
Court. The area within the counsellors. bar, tigatign, deeply affecting from  many circum-
was seated to its utmost capacity by the ex- stances, ill who are to-be engaged in it, and
cellent arrangement of the Sheriff; and some- ;nvolviug under all circumstances, some of
the most important interests of society4
time before proceedings commenced every     It is my duty in opening the case, 4o state
portion o,f the Court room was filled to over- the law to you, and give you a brief outline
lowing,                                  of the evidence to be introduced.
Thi following named. gentlemen were er&   The first section of the 130th chapter of
aheolltow comse, enth e e     ee   the Rised Statutes, you perceive that tho'
punnelled to compose the jury :           the punishment is prescribed, the crime itself
Tisdale Drake, foreman; Benj. M. Acker- is not defined; and it is a remarkable cir-
man, 'hos, C. Baldwin, Joseph J. Bigelow cumstance that it is very difficult, .1 not im-
Gao. W. Bond, Henry R. Cazneau, Davil 3. possible, to find in the law books an exact
Collier, James W. Converse, Chas. S. A Ills, common law defiu;tion of Adultery. As to
JohnL P. Fairbanks, Christopher C. Gore, most offences the defects of the statute law
Samuel Vaughan.                           are remedied by a recurrence to the common
Each juror was interrogated as to his rela- law, which our progenitors br ught with them
tion or interest in the trial, and if he enter- to America, and are continued in force by the
tained any bias or projudice, or had expressed sixth chapter of our State Constitution; but
as to the crime of adultery, this remedy fails,
any qpnion relative to the case. Sevpral for, for some centuries, it has not been an of--
were set aside in consequence.           fence recognized by the temporal courts of
Commonwealth's Attorney, S. D. PA.- the common law of Fagland, and is not in.
dictable there. (Se Selkeld's reports, 552.)
xas, Esq, was assisted during the trial by In very ancient times it was punished by ape.
Ws. BRIGHAM, Esq.                         cial statutes in the temporal courts, but lat-
Ex Judge WaRE and JOHN A. BMLISferly (since the statute of 19, Edward the
first, of circumnspecte agat&) only in the courts
Esq. appeared as counsel for the defence  christian (the ecclesiastical courts) by penance
The indctment against the prisoner was pras auteanimae, perpetual exiles, orperpetu-
read, and.,set forth that on the 19th of Dec. al imprisonment.  (See Gibson's Codez,
1841, he committed the crime of adultery!l085 )        ..    .     .    ....     .
..... Mis R d    D   .                    The name of the offence is said to besn
wth  Miss Rhoda Daidson.               f abridgement of Ad althonme thwrum., though
MR PARK&.'S OPENING ADDRESS.         jsome lawyers derive it from aduljeratinffthe
In the progress of the trials at this term,| issue of the marriage bed, an opinion that de.
gentlemen of the jury, we have now arrived Irives countenance from the fact that an nn-
at a priosecution'of no ordinry importance ;married woman cannot commit the crime. It
It derives its interest from the heighnousness is an Offence whichi seems to have been well
of the crime charged, and te previous res- understood without g studied definitiop t is

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most