About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

12 Monthly Tax Features 1 (1968)

handle is hein.tera/taxfeaturs0012 and id is 1 raw text is: TAX FOUNDATION'S
MONTHLY TAX FEATURES
Copyright 1968 by Tax Fondation, Inc., 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N. Y. 10020

January 1968
Vol. 12, Number 1

Fears '68 Tax
Hikes Will
Cancel Raise
Niueteen hundred and sixty-
eight may be a banner year for
Charlie Green, a fairly repsre-
sentative American, says Tax
Foundation. tlt, adds the re-
search otganization, die banner
iay tiiin ot to be a stoT1n
ait ,nng flag.
Charlit., who lives itn ile sib
itihs of a laige city, is uarticti
aid  the  father  of  t,'%o  children.
Cuiteitly, lie earns $10.00A
)ear hitt expects to get a $t0o.
a-aea  raise sometime between
tns,' and  Croundhog Day
(Flt. 21.
lit (:harlie -- anti all the
otiler Charlies in the U.S.-are
eculerlled, says 'ax Foundation,
In!. ati Iw-hat a liossilte Fed-
eral incoit  tax srchalge, tile
increase iii social security taxes,
hIts te likely 3!/2 peicent rise in
the cost itf living during 1960 is
going It) do to his raise.
Ott a $100 raise such as
Charli, e'pects, the regular in.
coltie tax ,woild atmount to $68.
If ass 8 percent income tax siir-
ehaige is passed in the current
sissit i  (f C'.ongrcss, in Charlie's
ease, it could amnoint to as niuch
as $6 in Charlie's $100 raise or
$95 on his total income.
T'rouigh 1967, Charlie's wages
in excess o $6,600 s-e,.! free of
I tab for social security taxes.
h:ut hcause of ive new, iroad-
ened base, Charlie is going to he
hit for $52.80 more for his old.
age tax. 'hat will, of course,coune
It of this raise, too. Formerly,
the bat' was $6,600. It becomes
$7,800 this year, bit tite per-
eentage (4.4.) lie pays rinialsIS
ite  san .  T he  rate  goes  'u! ) to
1.8 percent it 1969, an, by
1971. (harlie will be paying
$115 mor' in social security taxes
ihan he dill in 1967.
Witlh Inlation filling in an en'
larintg pars t fthe pictlre, econ.
insts expect tite Consumer price
itidex still go sip by abotit 3!/
1percent in 1968. If this turns
Oti to be site case, Charlie and
his fasnily will have to lay out $9
stntre of his raise ($290 of his
total income )to keep tip witi
the higher cost of living.
From site vansage point of a
brand new ycar, says the Foun.
datson, it looks as though Char.
lie is going to come out with
solitesthing less than that $400.
In  itemized  form  below  are
given site effects of new  tax
cltiges. social securily tax in.
creaseis, asid inllation Oil Char-
lie's total income, including his
raise:
c lttiti's  p r  Ii   .  . ........ ..
t ,s . ist ,  sottto iti tat  53
Inssriat. Ison is Si ltStU y ii ,,,. $
Pitt                    i   ts
i    lse  .  State.. . . .... 2I ,
Into Dnit os s . ........t..... ...
Total tlriose  0, total itcom .  i- 7-3
Which leaves a New     York
Charlie $73 behlinl his salary
inerease.
Not ilitld in this tabula.
tion, nites the Fouindation, Muiist
lie olher lrosseclive state tax
ikeis swhii, lik  (le proposed
N.V. levy, will ditiiinsih incomes
if' 1968. Ilast year 20 states and
tlousands of loc'al governtent
units Iikeld thir taxes.
Ev1 ithe stamp Charlie sill
iti' se send in i s inme e iax
rellt Its io Fede-al and state got-.
einiens (it the 38 slates note
taxing individual incm e) will
crmt Ili?, a Ipenny more.

The Income Tax Goes to Town
1967 Rate of City Income Tax on Residents.
by City Size
100
ate
40
Cuit iIthsooslnlIt

it Asnericau city's inconme tax rate, says '.Tax Foundatlon. Site., ores-
1ioutdst roughly with its size. 'lie chart shows ftiat 88 percent of the
nation's largest cities ind 56 percent of its smaller ones impose an it.
coie tax at a rate of I percent or higher. Similarly. 'I-I percent of the
stllaler cities but only 12 percent of the larger ones have rates lower
titan I ter ens. Of all cities levyitg an income six, 64 percent inipose
a rate of Iterceit or higher.
'The reat bulk of ineometax clites, accorhilg to a new Foundation
study Cly Income Taxes, hate fewer thtan 25,000 ilialbtants, but the city
income tax nonetheless appears to be primarily a big-city phenmenon.
Abiout 40 percent ol cities with 500,!tt0 or more population, but only
9 percent of cities wiit 58,000 to 100.000 poplation had begun an
inonie tax hsy 1967, says t e Fouttlition's stud y.
(2 eoluins malt available without charge on reqtlet)
State Cigarette Tax Rates Rise;
Rut U.S. Levy Stays 8c Since 1951
The current, 8-rent- a -pack, its rate from 8 to 13 cents, nak.
Federal cigarette sax has been  tng it the highest in tite land,
in effect for 16 )cars, Fiax Form.  Previously, New Jersey, Wash.
dation, Inc. 'loinis ot. For all ington   end T  rxs wth I  a-ceots.
these years the tax has been    n-opack rates were the highest.
bringing in, on aerage, some      Net state colleclions from site
$1.7 billion a ityeag , soi   apakrtseesteigs.
'1 icigear.          arette tax hit the $1 million
'le longest lasting Federal  levelln 1923, the$1 billion mark
cigarette tax rate-just over 20  in 1962 and were half way to
years-notes the Foundation,    kite $2 billion point in 1966.
was the 6-cents-a-pack tax, front
1919 to niM-19.10 when an ad-  Like Kitty, 'Temporary'
ditiotal half cent tax was ap-
plied. Next longest st-as a I cent  Tax Grows To Cut Size
rate tiat lasting frn 1883 to    Ring out the old year; ring
1897.                      .    in ite new, says Tax Founda-
Federal tax collections ot tig-  Clan, Inc., noting that in 1968,
arettes first brought in $1 million  as in other ntears, many a tax
in 1890 (tie rate was I-cent-ao  proposal that starts out on a
pack). Collections reached ithe  'temporary' basis may wind sip
$1 billion mark in 1946 when    as a permanent levy.
site rate was 6.5 ceits-a-pack.  As evidence, the research o.
The $2 billion collection level  ganizasion points out that within
was reached in 1963 wt  the  the month, a temporary 3 per-
8-ceit rate.                   cent sales and use tax enacted in
hlowever, points out to Foun-  Massachusetts in  1966-sup.
dation, in the period IP.'t-1967, posed to expire on December 31,
while site Federal rate held at 8  1967-hs been made perma-
cents, most of the states boosted  nent.
their rates two or more times.    And, even before a teron
Three states (Wisconsin, Nes    rary I cent a gallon gasoline
Jersey and Connectcut) upped    tax rate increase (from 6 cents
their rates five times between  to 7 cents) in Idaho could take
1950 aud 1966; many increased  effect on January I this year, the
iheir rates four times.        levy was made permanent. The
Cigarette tax rates are still ris-  temporary tax was supposed
ing as states cast alioit for rev.  to expire December 31, 199 and
esitics to meet growing dcpands  was calculated to bring in about
for services, says the Fountation.  $6 million.
In 1967, II states raised their   As a pernsanent tax it can
rates wt Pensylvania lifting  bring in more, for, as the Foun.
dation points out, tite Federal
No Tax Required                 tax on gasoline started out-at
A tax qtestion ihot left the o)  I cent per gallon-as a tempo.
eratcrs of a hovercrafi np iii the  rary proposition during the De-
air-literally and figuratively-  lression.
has now been resolved, says 'rax  Thatemporarytaxhasbeen
Foundation, Inc.                on the books more than 35 years,
rThe qustion: is the cost of a  tIte Foundation pointed out, his
ride on an air cushion vehicle  been increased several times (it
subjcct to tite 5 percent Federal  is now 4 cents) and has grossed
tax on transportation of persons  nearly $33 billion.
by air?                           A U.S. Treasury report for
Since tie vehicles rio not use  fiscal 1933, shows that at the
airlanes, airports, or any of the  1932 1 cent a gallon rate, col-
facilities eomtonly used by con.  lections anoionted to about $125
ventional aircraft, tite tax does  million. The rate scent up to 1.5
ot apply, ruled the Internal cents in 1933, backed down to
Reentue Service. The U.S. col-  I cent in 1934, and went back
lected $1110 million on the air  npI) to 1.5 cents in 1940 where it
transluortation tax in fiscal 1966,  remained until 1951, when it be.
up $l4 million from the previous  canme 2 cents, then 3 cents in
year.                           1956, and 4 cents in 1959.

Study Sees City Income Tax
Hitting Half Nation's Big Cities
Back in the early I100's, Charleston, South Carolita, hit on a new
method of raising city revenc-a city peisonal income sax, notes
Tax Foundation, Inc. This levy was eventually abandoned and
wasn't tried again in any U.S. city until 1939. Ioweser. lost ttle
fas been more than made up for, according to a new Foundation
study, City Income Taxes.
If cities continue to impose 1960, it is estimated New Ymik
an income tax at the same rate   it Collection$ from iididual
as characterized the first six yearzand cot-o = ration incom h  via
of the 1960's, by 1975 well over  ma       $420 million,
half the large-city population (of  Th reanlt   ion
the U.S.) will be subject to a city  'ie Foundation points t
income tax, says tie new 47   that the pottion o1' tbt- Lage 6ii.
page study.                     poptlation stitjtct to a city is,.
Today, says the Foundation,   cone tax has ualy tlipl'd to il
more titan 1l nillion Amerirans  the last decade.
live in te more thain 171) U.S.  Large Increase Since 1960
big cities that inmpose vary.
ing types of incoe taxes. And    H owever, the major patt of
'countIess others who cotmtute  tile iiceaste has taken [)face
to these cities to work, pay a  since 19ft), the sitily Says. lit
tax on the incote they earn i   1950, for example, .6 million
those cities. Pittsburgh, for ex-  ptersons, or about II iercent (if
ample, levies a $10 occupational  the large city p oplatin, wete
tax on everyone eiplotyed there,  subject to tile ley, an iteleas'
regardless of residcnce.        of about 2.6t millin itulislials,
Tir study shows that over the  or   percentage pointis, sinc
last decade the city inctme tax  1939. ill( in the seen %eats
has  rovhded fairly substantial  sicer 1960, tihe populatit  c.%-
stnts  which represent a con-  ered by such taxes inrteacid by
siderabh pars of the taxes col-  12 ndmilon itidisiditals atid hv 25
lccted in cities rislng a persmal  percentage points.
income levy, in soie cases Iit to  The study aiso show.s that
71 percent.                     while cily inente tax rtllctlons.
Most recently-available figures  nationwide, are not large rout-
show, says the Foundatioti, that  hated  hith the prperty lasx.
total income taxes collected in all  those majr cities siils do ttre
the major cities rose from $120  these leties got from 20 to 71
million, (or 4 percent if all  percent of revenue ftom them.
taxes) in 1956, to $293 million,  In general, says the Fotunda.
(5.6 percent) in 1966. The $293  tto, ter ca italtnpetiiv taxe
million, points rnt the study,  are lower in major citie'itpos.
comes to about 9 percent of the  itg an income tax thalt in those
property taxes collected  that  non-incotne tax cities of ctis.
same -year (1966) by all the    parable size. The fact that in
large cities,                   all int one case. per capita prop.
Bunt, adds the Foundation, the  erty taxes and her rapita total
$293 million figure skips the fact  taxes have risen in the last tie-
thit, since 1966, New York, Bal-  ade by smaller percentages in in-
tirnaore and Cleveland have in-  cote tax cities, suggests that the
troduced income taxes.          income tax has not been so ilch
In New York City alone, col-  a supplemental reventie source
lections from the tax in fiscal  as a substititte for existing tax's,
1967, the first year it was levied,  'taking some of tite pressure off
totaled $395 million. In fiscal  tie property tax in particular.
000 Office of Economic Oppor-
tunity grant to the University of  ZI
Wisconsin, 800 families, begin-  e
ning next month, will get nega.                        0
live income tax payments, aver-  %
aging $1,200 apiece. These pay-                    -
mnits, like a guaranteed annual          ...'
income, would make sip, sup.          9
posedly, tie difference between        4
what the f.unily bread winner
earned and $3,000, plus, consid-  to Swn cnoinries on the saute day.
ered to be te threshold of the  Te trip resulted,fie said, in nier-
poverty lIne. The paymettts  lapping collections of fyen, rupeis,
are designed to encourage bread  drachias, lira, rsctdrros, marks
winners o find jobs, or better  and kroner. And 2i1/at else it n,'v
paying jobs. As their earned in-  on the balance of paynetsr!
come increased, tie guaran-          #    *     as   41
teed payments would decrease.    GONE. The General Accinnt-
*    *       *            ing Office made a surey of how
TRAVEL. House of Repre-       Office of Economic Opportunity
sentatives approval for members  funds were spent in ott,' Ken.
of two committees So tavel     tucky county and found: $295,.
abroad twas ;ranted recently-   000 of tite $1.1 million expended
with the proviso /hat there be no  for the country's coinniunity ac.
collecting for rmore thtan one  tion program %sas in the natite
day's expence a day. Congress-  of direct benefits to the poor.
janaf travels es are limited by law  Travel costs of communiy coin-
to expense money of $50 per day  cii etloyees frot 1961 tlioigh
in She currency of the country  1966, said GAO, aineittisrd to
hey arc viling, but, according  more tianS $97,000, alhost one-
to Rep. Gross (Iowa), some      third of the aoutnt of fuinds that
members in 1966 collected $100  supposedly went directly to th
a day more than once by going   poor.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most