About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Export Tax Benefits and the WTO: Foreign Sales Corporations and the Extraterritorial Replacement Provisions , Record No.: RS20746, Date: June 25, 2002 (tax exemption) 1 (June 25, 2002)

handle is hein.tera/crstax0184 and id is 1 raw text is: Order Code RS20746 Updated June 25, 2002 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Export Tax Benefits and the WTO: Foreign Sales Corporations and the Extraterritorial Replacement Provisions David L. Brumbaugh Specialist in Public Finance Government and Finance Division Summary The U.S. tax code's Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) provisions provided a tax benefit for U.S. exporters, permitting U.S. exporters to exempt part of their export income from U.S. tax. However, the countries of the European Union (EU) in 1997 charged that the provision was an export subsidy and thus contravened the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements. A WTO panel ruling essentially upheld the EU complaint. To avoid WTO-sanctioned retaliatory tariffs, the United States in November 2000 repealed FSC and enacted new extraterritorial income (ETI) provisions, consisting of a tax benefit for exports of the same magnitude as FSC. The EU maintained that the new provisions are likewise not WTO-compliant and asked the WTO to rule on the matter and to approve $4 billion in retaliatory tariffs on U.S. products. A WTO panel issued a report in August 2001 that concluded the ETI provisions are not WTO-compliant. The United States appealed the decision, but on January 14, 2002, an appellate body denied the appeal. A WTO arbitration panel subsequently began consideration of the EU's request for tariffs; a ruling is expected in mid-July. For its part, economic analysis suggests that FSC and ETI do little to increase exports but likely trigger exchange rate adjustments that also result in an increase in U.S. imports; the long-run impact on the trade balance is probably extremely small. Economic theory also suggests the export incentives likely reduce U.S. economic welfare. This report will be updated as events in Congress and elsewhere occur. Historical Background: DISC and the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade The current FSC/ETI controversy has its roots in the legislative antecedent of both: the U.S. tax code's Domestic International Sales Corporation (DISC) provisions, enacted as part of the Revenue Act of 1971 (P.L. 92-178). Like FSC and the ETI provisions, DISC provided a tax incentive to export, although its design was different in certain respects. It was thought that a tax incentive for exports was desirable to stimulate the U.S. economy; to offset the tax code's deferral benefit, which posed an incentive for Congressional Research Service * The Library of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most