About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Arthur P. Hall, Analysis and Summary of the Contract With America Tax Relief Act of 1995 1 (1995)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/sregxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: FOUN DAT ION
March 1995
Number 46

Analysis and Surnny of the Contract
With America TxR ii f Act of 1995

The tax provisions in the Contract With
America, if enacted, will reduce Americans'
tax burden by an estimated $ 188.8 billion over
the five-year budget period from 1995 to 2000.
At the same time, the provisions will slightly
increase the share of the income tax burden
bornc by those taxpayers with $75,000 or more
of adjusted gross income, as Fire I and
T'able I demonstrate.

Figure 1
Share of Individual Income Jaxes Under Current Law and Proposed
Contract Provisions, by Income (lass, 1995-2000
30.0%                                                0  0
* Current Law
25.000-
D   Proposed Law
20.0%.                                    N
15.0% -
;                            .           L3 ¢
10.0%_  as
o
5.0% -
0.0%-
6a.      6c 066)             6c)   6)
5.MI00o                       )    cl(    0 0
0                  c0      53    0     5 o0   q
-5.0%
(n 0)u                     u-5 0

Table 2 reports estimates of how the
Contract's tax reductions will be distrib-
Utcd across different income groups. The
estimated average tax reduction for all
income tax filers amounts to $1,552 over
the 1995 to 2000 time period. The only
provision estimated to expose more tax-
payer income to taxation is the American
l)ream Savings Account (AI)SA). The as-
stImption is that taxpayers will forego tax
deductible contributions to other retire-
nentt-type accounts in order to make non-
deductible contributions to an ADS ac-
count that permits tax-free money growth
and tax-free withdrawals for specified ex-
penditures like college tuition. In Table
2, the revenues raised from the ADS ac-
counts offset the $500 million in estimat-
ecl tax relief provided by the spousal IRA
provision.
Table -3 distributes the Contract's
tax red uction across the different states.
7able 4 and Figure 2 show the net tax
savings per income tax filer in each state.
Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Cali-
fornia, and Massachusetts rank as the top
five states in terms of per-filer tax savings,
(The District of' (.olimbia would rank
fourth if it were a state.) Alabama, Alas-
ka, %Mississippi, South l)akota, and North
l)akota rank as the bottom five states in
terms of per-filer savings.
In what follows, the key provisions
of the Contract with America Tax Relief
Act of' 1995 are described and summa-
rized. Figure -3 illustrates how the net
tax reduction measures are divided
among the various titles of the Act.

SO11fCC lix ;I OIIItldaiot).

13j' Arthur P. IlMll, PhDI).
T[ifx Folulldatioln

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most