About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

86 IRET Policy Bulletin 1 (2003)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretpbul0045 and id is 1 raw text is: May 14, 2003
No. 86
FINANCIAL PRIVACY AND INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY
Introduction
Well before the September 11 attacks, a major European-led international effort was underway
to promote greater intergovernmental information sharing and to effectively end financial privacy.
Although there was some interest in the law enforcement aspects of this program by the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury Department (FinCEN) and, internationally, by
the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF), it was clear that the primary
motivation of the governments leading the effort was tax administration.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a major
initiative in 1996 designed to abolish financial privacy and limit tax competition by blacklisting low-
tax jurisdictions or so-called tax havens (the OECD Harmful Tax Competition initiative). In 2000,
the United Nations (UN) commenced a campaign to enable the UN to share financial information
among UN member states through the proposed United Nations International Tax Organization
(UNITO). The United States government made important contributions to the effort with the
proposed bank deposit interest reporting regulations, the qualified intermediary (QI) rules, the
effective incorporation of know your customer (KYC) banking regulations into the U.S. QI rules
and support for the OECD and other initiatives. The European Union also launched its Savings Tax
Directive designed to share information among EU member states and other key financial centers,
including the U.S. and Switzerland.
Law enforcement officials need reliable information to combat serious crimes, prevent terrorism
and protect national security. Congressional testimony and reports in the U.S. and European news
media made it clear very soon after the attacks, however, that the current information sharing
framework both within the U.S. government and internationally is simply inadequate and
misdirected for purposes of addressing the threat that terrorism poses to the United States and allied
countries. The approach that has been adopted so far is largely to do more of what has been
ineffective. Moreover, many of the innovations or new initiatives inaugurated since the attacks
will actually make the situation worse.
The political situation since the attacks has changed dramatically. There has been an
acceleration in the demands to share information and a further degradation in privacy concerns. This
was demonstrated, most notably, by the enactment in October, 2001 of the International
Institute for         IRET is a non-profit, tax exempt 501(c)3 economic policy research and educational
Research                organization devoted to informing the public about policies that will promote
on the                      economic growth and efficient operation of the market economy.
Economics of     1710 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W., 11th Floor * Washington, D.C. 20006
Taxation             (202) 463-1400 * Fax (202) 463-6199 * Internet www.iret.org

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most