About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

174 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2004)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0171 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies thait will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.

May 26, 2004

Advisory No. 174

GASOLINE PRICE HIKES SPAWN POOR POLICY PRESCRIPTIONS

Recent increases in the price of gasoline and
other energy products have led to calls for federal
action. The best policy is to be patient and let
markets work to increase supply and restrain demand.
Patience, however, is in short supply in an election
year, and policy makers delight in having an excuse
to increase their power and their press coverage. The
resulting proposals are almost universally bad.
For example, Charles Krauthammer's May 21st
column in the Washington Post and Investor's
Business Daily on the spike in gasoline prices gets an
A for angst and an E for economics. He laments
that we did not impose a high tax on gasoline when
oil prices were $7 a barrel to push conservation, drive
down oil prices for producers, and drive gasoline
prices to $3 a gallon with the extra money pumped
into the U.S. economy (via the U.S. Treasury) rather
than having it shipped to Saudi Arabia...  His
statement assumes that suppliers would pay much of
the tax in the form of lower world oil prices. As for
the tax revenue, he assumes that Congress would
lower other taxes with the revenues, with consumers
no worse off. He would use tax policy to reorder the
U.S. economy to be less dependent on foreign oil.
Krauthammer's   willingness  to  intervene
massively in the U.S. economy for geopolitical
advantage is unnerving. His belief that it would be
relatively costless rests on two wrong assumptions:
that producers would continue to sell willingly at the
depressed price (inelastic supply) and that consumers
would readily reduce their consumption with little
inconvenience (elastic demand). Only then would
suppliers bear most of the tax, and consumers suffer
little pain of adjustment. (Chart 1.)

Real world measurements show a highly elastic
energy supply - short term, if the U.S. doesn't pay
the world price, it doesn't get the goods; long term,
price increases induce new   supplies and new
technologies that have kept energy prices falling in
real terms for decades - and fairly inelastic demand
- consumers cut back very little in the short run and
only modestly in the long run when the real price
changes. (Chart 2.)  Krauthammer's prescription
would have cost consumers a bundle for years, and
would have left pre-tax world oil and gasoline prices
about where they are now, with tax-inclusive gasoline
prices about $0.50 to $1.00 above current prices at
the pump. Economic distortions would be large and
permanent.   Krauthammer makes a third wrong
assumption: that Congress would cut other taxes in a
beneficial manner that would leave the economy and
the consumer better off in spite of the distortions.
History suggests Congress would spend every cent.
It makes no sense to create an artificial scarcity
today because a resource might become scarce in the
future. That just moves the potential pain forward
and turns it into a certainty. Even ignoring the
benefits in  present  value  of  deferring  the
(hypothetical) cost of adjustment, note that future
technology will be more advanced and future
generations will be richer; new reserves will be
tapped more easily in the future and the need, if any,
to switch to alternative fuels will be handled more
easily then than now. In fact, the 21st century may
well see declining real energy prices, just like the
20th.
As for geopolitical concerns that we shouldn't be
dependent for our energy on people who hate us, that

e~em       kfl                            A      *   *   gg~     8      ~eg

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most