About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

12 Pitt. Legal J. 1 (1864-1865)

handle is hein.statereports/pittlegj0012 and id is 1 raw text is: 




            '.H                       LEGAL                            JO'URNAL

     q imeAi for that' 1 ,eol,:*iv'or            1*t E !U'4O .0S ( i., ki I lFifilh AIreieI. I     'f' vo iolln rs e r,
   Vc1. X11,                           PIT    1,GH, MONDAY, JULY 4, 1              -.o. .,

         6dI pr, ceee.,ed hy                               ,,'titin to ie,,over the the stock mi''ht be sn Jeetd by order of Ilh
                                         I d aIgI Itaniii S c a a sed  tI   hi   Iy  Ile i Iing  (f the  ieehn'(toVs.
           is PuBlMs.Ii  Vr:n v  . oso, , sid 1r0ad, and  that no danini. s were allowed  I The  ,ff et  if suoih erl'i-te i-i to give th1
    A ' 1 0 0 T \ V ) L A I S 1 .' t ; , , I J , I N A OV A l E h i m h y t i l e v i e w e' S , W . h o - ( r e p o r t l oa s h e l e n h o l d e r a t i l o c tr ol i l t o ta l p n1) ( 1 1 1 h i s m a k i n
                                          finallv conhfrmed iby the court.  Tis ks ad- further paynent,, it't al,,il , but leaves such
           'T'ii()1 ,1  .1. I-RI'NA.N,    lnltlted, and dn'lol 0 toS 103 bar.  payment optionad W\ith him.
    'r ,thl  ayof tih  ol S..rr.,'  C.rt Mi V'e'usylv.,, W. )  'IIs  is  lile onlv  proper  way,' ,I  hringing ' The  by-lavs  reqIiiing  tile  assent. of  five
             ELL TiUH ASO, r',,itiiroi,   such a (It feuce  let!oie Iblis  court. beerau-e  it  directors to a call  lpo the stoulkhold'rs; tim
      . i. IF [U       N I if, a Street,  appears Iy a different rtcord trin that which facts that the detendtlait wit-, a dirCOtor. thaL
                              , :         is bronght itp hty I he crliora'i, sid that, re- no call was made. and tlat ihe Company ho.
    '.,, ,Itl ,a  Leti a on li il s-t 1t4 be it 1.r. v  1.  CoAd  cannot.  reg1t;arty  lite  noticed  unlessl came  in.olvent, whtn  th   amount whiuh  rt.
    + At .,,,i  ., ' ....... ,' .v  It  N ; , to  t ..i l  , r it  I h'roight  helor  (is  b\  )lea.  oI ined  due opon  its  stock  and  subject  to  call
  r. .... t,, ,.  ,.v, ,  h Vt,. , 1 .it  r ,r  (e ltainly  ll is fitt does co l tilfte  a  lbart to  was  more  than  suflicient. to  pity  all its  debt:,
  fan,   iiie  l n r 1.  tIIlt t__this writ. for   the two  itelet cie.s  ;re ent irey  do  not. establish any  personal liability  against
            'r    ct',.R  n l ' 0 r.      ineoiisisleni ; the first suing for the damages such director.
  On5,eqth ,., f t1 ,,- , iif, I. .......................  *,o  cau.sed  by  a pioeeidinwr, and the second  to r '- The principle upon which persons subserib.
  'l' l I tj,-Ifig  ill  e -t-i+' ...............................  %
  On -q r,' 0 te, r, t .... .....    3O verse that saMe i oteedinlg. To ailow this ing or engaging to tthe stock aie held litblo
    D~o  .x fit.... 118 ....... .......................... 1(; 00  would  he e,(,ti\alent to  alhowh+-  tw o  rtcover,  eonlsider' , find  tile  case  discussed  by  Allen,
    D.,) Pit, I'n  I ............... ....................1'    ies  toi- tile  iline  catise.  T he  phointifi in  elr,  .
             ..i.    ......        ..   iwolI5

     SIi~tIciaieI Coltii'It ;)d 11'lin edy of his own in the                      Sweetam v. Prince   al.-One who was
                                         the road, and cannot now reverse it : 17 S. & enttled to logs which he-had cut upon tho
              Weaver's ltoad.            R. 365   lie has himself aflii,'me1 the order ltnd of another, under an agreemer t that they
  Estoplil by recrord.-Proccd ing Jf,  land just as Oninh as if it' had released his lam- were to Ie his wheu he paid a certain sum,
    unlages, (a wail. / (1 n1inplal  L -1l  l tyec;()Vbe. paid them. or had suffered tle 'reativ Inferior to their value its logs, sold
    ularit// in proccedii:.g Jb  cnilg primte Stitl of Lim ions 10 rtu rgtinst his writthem, wilhuut, disclosinz his defect of title.
    road.                               1 of, ertiorari. The omission to fmi the width vThe vendee, after learn inr the facts, agreed
  1. After a private rand 1nid been laid mt and oi,.ne. and of le i'otd Cain easily be suipplied by the ao- to pay upon a deduction heing ntde from tie
  the puty through whoseland. it ran had iroceeded hy t, I width as openid, or LW t1tie culstomahry ,price upon other ground Ihan the detect of
  pethiion to oroeve' ditijiages tl  'efor. leld, that he   d  .ould
           - t+ yr,..,  . .-  -    .   , withlof Ir 'ate roadsr thIbus ooed,on sono  tie title. '1lhi) was a waiver of defense on
   tder of cofirmation for oy defects Lrirtn,  I other. way. unless the parties desire to be lit th e gaou-ds~offiti,'................• -
 2. Hence. where a 'an,.ow,,er sued out a rertirari to re- igious, \ hich we do not presume. The fact  Assuming that the vendor w as guilty of
   Terse thi cenflrntntuon oia prieait' rotI lal out titghit.,,leaded and admitted estops the plaintiff of' deceit, and tha' th vende  had not waived
   hii;l  a   d    t   t    r   li    e   i.Ihis defense, itether he could setit up, no
   (bher road  iva., ordere,  hn1tiii1  tt'iteeeihtg, io recover I  i  e toaI 1-    (61CW    e-lrle  c ud s ti~ p   o
   iho rteor. andtihat no tlnigtue - ro i ewed hit by t.Ii  Order affirmed, and record remitted, with having been disturbed in the possession by
   viewers whn. report ih , itll i: ally o,,firmed. costs,                       the person having the legal title, and not
 3. It is, I ot ajal error to the pre ediig,t that tie ordher 1__.               having ofIered to return the property to the
 of confirmatinonr toes 11i1 fix the width f tilhe rea], for thit                      o     ty
 can be afterward.; supplied.                   Newt York Court o' Appeals.      vendor, quarc: Per Marvin, J.
                                                                                   The vendee of chattels may, it, seems, vol.
   ron       Jo  he     ateressinso           hOTES       rsuntarily yield possession to a claimant, and
 inrt i       igdin O                        r    V. Sturgess.-The Act (eb. 234 recover against the vendor on the implied
   .i.                tue istane      n of o18o5) in rehlation to suits against foreign warrant.y of title, upon showing that th
 Barkstresser, thro.ih whose land a private eporpo'aions (foes not undertake to establsh claimant had title paramount Per Marvin, J'
          Cot                                                    rtalt toi esabis climn the atltleo paaout Peracobin J
eroad 'as laid out on the application of Jacolt tiny new lilhiliiy on the part of stockholders
     ,, .                                or delitors of such corporation,-, but only pro- Iaws of Penn'a,-Sesslon of 1804.
f alie bots of the ease are fully set forth i !rides for sulrogating creditor! of the corpor-
.Ae opinion of this coirr.               aiohn, proceeding agrlinst it by attachment in         Av ACT
   R. Bruce Petrikin, for laintiff in error.  this State, to sueh rights as the corporation To increase the pay of jurors and witnesses
   The counsel for the def,-ndant in orror slnb- itself, 1nder tile local law, or tihe hx loci coa-  in the counties of namhria and Atlegheny..
nitted no printed araument.              tr, ,lus, might have enforced against t lie stock-  Si':: ro*N 1. He it enacted &c, That hero-
   The opinion of the court, was delivered, holder or debtor,                   ahter, the pity orjtrors, attendihg the several
 July 1st 1863, by                         In in action, therefore, against an alletted courts of the countiies of Cambria and Alle.
   Lowaw, C. J.-Pursuing the usual remedy, debtor of a Maryland corporation, in which gieny, shall be one dollar and fifty cents per
 'this private road was laid out and confirmed no statuot of Ma'yhand was proved affecting diem ; and the fees of witnesses, attending
 !by te court;, and actually opened, and nov his liability, it is to be determined by the shid court, shall be one dollar per diem, to.
 'tneplaintiff in error, through whose round common law.                        gether with the mileage now paid to jurors
 -It passes, hirings this certiorari to reverse the I  The corporation being created for the pri- and witnesses in said county.
 :'btder of confirmation, and assigns for error vate hen-fit of its p'ojectors, and not for any
 thatin the petition, an intermediate point he. , public object, no contract to pay for its stobk   AN AcT
1tt'een thne termini is designated, and that in any further sum than that required upon the  Relating to Ground Rents.
  10 ord6i no width is fixed, &e, In bar of original suhiscripion is to be implied from  SECTION 1. Be it enacted &c. That th
  hose errors, Mr. Weaver pleads that, after sei l suselipiol. Ce from taking certifieates enactment, by the twenty-first section, of the
.b e road was ordered, the plaintiff in error of stock stating the further payments to which act, of the twenty-second day of Ap'il, eight.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most