About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Joseph S. Cucullu, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louis Emmerling U.S. 83 (1860)

handle is hein.slavery/ussccases0176 and id is 1 raw text is: DECEM3ER TERM, ?859.                      83
Cu=uu v. EirmZling.
the contract, as far as it had been executed, and to enable him
to complete it according to the engagement that had been en'
tored into.
The power of attorney and the deed had been on the pub-
lic records for thirty-fo.ur years before this suit was com-
menced, and for five years these defendants had been in the
actual possesion of the property. It had been repeatedly sold
during this long period. To the inquiry made of the witness,
whether the purchase money had been paid to the grantors, or
-vhether the security on real .property had been taken, he an-
swers: This affiant is informed and believes that most of the
lands were sold to William O'Hara without security, or the
payment of anything in hand upon the promissory notes of
the said O'Hara, which, as this afflant is informed and be-
lieves, were in the hands of Beck at the time of his death, and
'copies of which, * * as he is informed and believes, * * *
are annexed. It is the opinion of the court that this testi-
mony was not admissible; and although it was read to the
jury, it did not contain anything to warrant a conclusion un-
-favorable to the title of the defendants.
Judgment affirmed.
JOSEPH S. CUOULLU, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. Louis EmMRiad.
Whre, according to the practice in Louisiana, the facts of the case are stated
by the court below in the nature of a special verdict, an objection that the
contract sued upon could not be proved by one witness only, comes too late
when made for the first time in this court.
According to that practice, the judge below finds facts, and not evidence of those
facta
THIS case .was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit
Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
In 1857, Emmerling, a resident of New Orleans, an alien
subject of the Grand Duke of Hesse Darmstadt, filed his peti-
tion in the Oircuit Court, alleging that Cucullu had employed
him as a broker to sell an estate. The cause was submitted
to the court below, which ibund the following facts, viz:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most