About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Cowperthwaite, versus Jones, et al. U.S. 55 (1790)

handle is hein.slavery/ussccases0063 and id is 1 raw text is: PhuI ldeVWa Cou RT o  CoMMot1 1'AStS
fendant anfwerable, would be alike wanting in either cafe. 1 79.
'There feems no difference in point of fairnefs, between' the toy-
defendant's receiving the money under a judgment of court,,
without fraud or collufion, and his receiving.it from the hands
of Fairchild himfelf. If Fairchild had received the money on
thefe notes himfelf, and paid it voluntarily to Amory, it could
not be pretended that the plaintiffs, although the money ought
to have been paid to them, could have any recourfe to Imory ;
for, if-it might be the fubje& of controverfy when a man re-
-ceives a debt, whether the debtor pays it out of his own money
or another's, who would be fafe in receiving money ? The
nature of money, and the nature of commerce, forbid fuch an
enquiry. The payment by Smith, the agent of Fairchild, was in
effe& a payment by Fairchild; and its being made in confe-
quence of a judgment of court, could, at leaft, not weaken the
defendant's right of receiving it.
For thefe reafons, we are of opinion, that the prefent aaion
is not fupportable againft Amry, and confequently that the
verdi& was againft law. The motion for a new trial is there.
Lore granted.*
COWPERTHW&iTE, verfus JoNEs, et. al.
A     MOTION for a new trial having been made and ari
A      gued in this caufe, the PRESIDENT now delivered the
'opinion of the Court, in the following terms.
SHIPPEN, Prefident :-The motion for a new trial in thio
caufe has,been made on feveral grounds :-it. Bec.ufe the
jury have mifbehaved, in adopting an improfer mode of eftimat-
ing the damagei ; by fetting down each- the particular fum be
thoughtjuf t, and then dividing the aggregate by the number of
jurymen. 2d. Becaufe the damages are faid to be exceffive.
3d. Becaufe the verdi& was ccntrary to the evidence. And,
4th. Becaufe it was founded on a miftake in point of law ; the
ury fuppofing that, on paymeift of the damages, the Negro,
(whofe freedom was in queftion) would be emancipated.
New trials are frequently neceffary, for the purpofe of attain-
ing complete juftice ; but the important right of trial by jury
requires they fhould never be granted without folid and fubftan-
tial reafons ; otherwife the province of jurymen might be oftert
4ransferred to the judges, and thy infead of the jury, would
become
In conrequence of this decifion, the caure was removed inte
the Supreme- Court, where the principles- contained in Judge,
Buw.'sr opiiuiov# were alfo recognized and cfkablifhed. See ps$,.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most