About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Henry Wilson, Speech of Hon. Henry Wilson, of Mass., in the Senate, March 27th, 1862, on the Bill to Abolish Slavery in the District of Columbia, Introduced by Him December 16th, 1861 1 (1862)

handle is hein.slavery/sphwma0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                               S P.E E C H

                                          OF-


HON. HENRY WILSON, OF MASS0,

                          In the Senate, MIarcli 27th, 1862,

ON THE BILL TO ABOLISH SLAVERY IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INTRODUCED I-Y HIm DE-
  CEMUBER 16TH, lS(?l, REFERRED TO .THE DISTRICT CO31MI'JTEE, AND REPORTED BACK WITH
  AMENDMENTS BY MR. I'IORIILL.

                                       0-


   Mr. WILSON, of M assachusetts; said:
   Mr. PRESIDENT: The first Congress under
the Constitution of the United States was sum-
moned to the consideration of questions of tran-
scendent importance, which excited the pro;
found interest of the nation and of the statesmen
of that age. Hildreth, in his History of the
United States, tells us that, of all the questions
discussed at this session, none produced so much
excitement as one startel towards the close of
it, respecting the pes n:nsuoet seat of the Federal
Government. The Eastern States would have
been content to retain the seat of government
in the city of New York, where the Continental
Congress had established it,; but Pennsylvania
sought to win it. back to Philadelphia, and
Maryland, Virginia, and the Carolinas sought
to fix it on the banks of the Potomac. The
members o4the East, supported by Pennsylva-
nia, hoping to conciliate the dissatisfied mem-
bers of the South, proposed to fix the permanent
seat of government on the Susquehanna, but
the proposition was sternly and violently op-
posed; and they were told by even the moderate
Madison, that if that day's proceedings had
been foreseen, Virginia would never have rati-
fied the Constitution.
   The House bill, locating the Capital on the
Susquehanna, amended by the Senate so as to
fix the seat of government in a district ten miles
square adjoining Philadelphia, failed through
,the growing opposition and manifest dissatis-
L ,rtion of the men of the South. Thus the
Congress of 17819 was stirred to its profoundest
depths by the absorbing question, whether the
national Capital should be located on the banks
of the Delaware, the Susquehanna, or the Po-
tomac. These conflicting claims of sections and
of interests defeated, in 17-9 all propositions
for the location of the seat of the national Capi-
tal; but at the next session, in 1790, a bargain,
a compromise, was consummated, between the
advocates of the assumption of the State debts,
under the i .-,d of Hamilton and Morris, and
a few members of Virginia, by which the House
of Representatives, after taking the yeas and
nays thirteen times, determined, by a vote of


thirty-two to twenty.-nine, to locate- the perma-
nent Capital of the Republic on the bai:s of
the Potomac. This victory over the North, won
by the skill and determination of the statesmen
of the South, placed the permanent Capital of
the new Republic on soil polluted by the foot-
steps of bondmen. This early vi(tory of the
leaders of Southern sentiment and opinion has
cast. its malign influences over the policy of the
national Government. Here, for two genera-
tions, the statesmen of republican and Christian
America have been surrounded by an atmos-
phere tainted by the breath of the slave, and by
the blinding and perverting influences of the
social life of slaveholding society.
  The Constitution gave Congress the power
to (.xe-cise exclusive legislation, in all cases
whatsoever, over the ceded ten miles square
we call the District of Columbia. Instead of
providing a code of humane, equal, and uniform
laws for the government of the capital of a
Christian nation, Congress enacted, in 1801,
that the laws of Maryland and Virginia, as they
then stood, should be in force on the north and
south sides of the Potomac. By this act the
inhuman and barbarous, the indecent and vul-
gar colonial slave codes of Maryland and Vir-
ginia became the laws of republican America
for the government of its chosen Capital. By
this act of national legislation the people of
Christian America began the first year of the
nineteenth century by accepting, re-affirming,
and re-enacting, for the government of their
Capital, the colonial legislation enacted for the
government of the wild hordes of Africa, which
the colonial nod commercial policy of' England
forced upon Maryland and Virginia.
  The national Government, by re-enacting
the slave codes of the ceding States for the
government of the ceded territory, accepted as
its creed the wicked dogma that color, in the
national Capital, is presumptive evidence of sla-
very. In 1827 the Committee for the District
of Columbia, in the House of Representatives,
reported that  in this District, as in all slave.-
holding States in the Union, the legal presump-
tion is , that persons of color going at laxgo

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most