About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Robt. Toombs, Speech of Hon. Robt. Toombs, of Georgia, on Property in Territories: Delivered in the Senate of the United States, May 21, 1860 1 (1860)

handle is hein.slavery/shrtg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                                  SPEECH

                                          OFI



 IION. ROBT. TOOMBS, OF GEORGIA,

                                         ON


           PROPERTY IN TERRITORIES.


  DELIVERED IN THlE SENYATE OF THE UNITED STATES, MAY 21, 1860.


  The Senate having under consideration the resolutions submitted by Mr. DAVIS On the lst of March,
1860, relative to the equality of the States, the rights of all the citizens to emigrate to the Territories with
slave property, and denying the power of Congress or a Territorial Legislature to interfere with this
right--Mr. TOOMBS said:
  Mr. PRESwEN-r:  I did not concur in the policy of introducing the resolutions upon your
tablq when   they were  originally presented by my friend from Mississippi, (Mr. DAVas,)
and, until within the last ten or twelve days, I had no purpose to participate in the deba t
upon  them.  I thought that they announced principles so just and so proper, of such i-
versal acceptance, that they needed no support from anything I might be able to say in
their favor. But, sir, within that time, these propositions, involving the fundamental
principles of our Government, have not only been assailed and condemned, but all those
who  hold them  and maintain them, as they were held and maintained by my personal and
political friends at the late Charleston convention, have been charged with violating good
faith, and with having  objects unfriendly to the existence of the Government; and my
own  humble  opinion has been invoked to swell the mighty torrent of authority by which
it is sought to overwhelm them.  I deem it, therefore, my duty to my country, myself,
and to those who agree with me in opinion, in all parts of the Republic, to defend these
principles.
  The  first objection which meets me is the declaration from some well-meaning men,
that they are abstractions. Sir, this is a great mistake. Far from it. There is a terrible
practicality in them. There is a vital energy in them that is shaking your political, your
social, and even your moral  systems from  the center to the circumferece.  They  are
struggJing to be acknowledged,  to be recognized; and in their recognition, in my judg-
ment, alone is to be found the permanent peace, safety, and security of the State.
  But, sir, if they be abstractions, they are scarcely less worthy of our consideration.
The great question is, are they truths ? To submit to wrong is often far less injurious to
society in its consequences than to surrender a principle. It is one of the marked charac-
teristics of the American character, one which attracted the attention and approbation of
some of the ablest and best men of the last century, that they measure a public danger by
a principle, and not by a grievance. Mr. Burke, in his speech on conciliation with Amicr-
iea, very beautifully expresses this characteristic of the American colonies. He says:
  In other countries the people, more simple and of a less mercurial caste, judge of an III principle -n
Government by an actual grievance; here they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the griev-
ance by the badness of the principle. They augur misgovernment at a distance, and snuff tyranny in the
Wintd breeze.
  One  of the greatest of our own statesmeai, often called the Father of the Constitution,
in a paper of great force and merit, which he drew  up in 1184, protesting against the
action of the Virginia Legislature, tending, in his judgment, to infringe the rights of con-
science, strongly applauded tjiis same characteristic of our people, He said:
  It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold tis prudent jealousy to be
the first duty of citizens, and one of the noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The freemen of
America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the qwestion
in precedents. They saw the consequences in the prinlple, and they avoided the consequences by deny-
ing the principle. We revere this lesson too much soon to forget It.
  Sir, the disregard of this sentiment has brought upon us many of our present dangers.
We,  too, must not  wait until dangerous  and  unsound  political principles -shall have
strengthened themselves by exercise, or shall have entangled us in precedents. We have
                 Printed by Lemuel  Towers, at $1 per hundred copies.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most