About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1992 Tennessee Attorney General Reports and Opinions 1 (1992)

handle is hein.sag/sagtn0121 and id is 1 raw text is: OPINTONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TENNESSEE Published by Authority of Chapter 276 Public Acts of 1971 March, 1992 92-22 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/TENNESSEE:Bills:Rejection: House Bill476/Senate Bill 1030, a bill limited by its caption to a call for a constitutional convention regarding taxation, is diff'areot in substance from Senate Bill 10, which called for a vote of the people on several questions including a constitutional convention regarding taxation, and does not violate Art. II, §19 of the Tennessee Constitution. Tenn. Const. Art. II, §17, Tenn. Const. Art. II, S1; Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 178-66 (June 17, 1975), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. U81-099 (April 7, 1981), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 84-182 (April 27, 1984), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 85-282 (November 18, 1985). 92-22 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/TENNESSEE:Conventions: House Bill476/Senate Bill 1030, a bill limited by its caption to a call for a constitutional convention regarding taxation, is different in substance from Senate Bill 10, which called for a vote of the people on several questions including a constitutional convention regarding taxation, and does not violate Art. II, S 19 of the Tennessee Constitution. Tenn. Const. Art. II, §17, Tenn. Const. Art. II, 519; Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 178-66 (June 17, 1975), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. U81-099 (April 7, 1981), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 84-182 (April 27, 1984), Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 85-282 (November 18, 1985). 92-27 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/TENNESSEE:Conventions: If House Bill 476/Senate Bill 1030 (dealing with Constitutional Conventions) is passed, the Convention in its recommendations would not be limited to the proposal found in section 63 of the bill. Tenn. Const., Art. Ii, S28, Art. II, §29, Art. II, §30, Art. XI, §3, Art. XI, §9; Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. November 19, 1973, Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 77-265 (August 16, 1977), up. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 77-299 (August 31, 1977). 92-20 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/TENNESSEE:Due Process: Decrease or cessation of indigent defense funds does not per se constitute a violation of right to counsel for indigent defendants under the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution, nor does the decrease or

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most