About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2014 Op. Iowa Att'y Gen. [i] (2014)

handle is hein.sag/sagia2014 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                                                           Mr. Dave  Patton
                                                     Office of the Attorney General
                                                          September  5, 2014
                                                     2014 WL  7777172 (Iowa A.G.)

                                                     Office of the Attorney General

                                                             State of Iowa
                                                                  *1
                                                          Opinion No. 14-9-1
                                                        *1 September 5, 2014
*1 COURTS:   Sheriff's service of process fees in dismissed state criminal cases. Iowa Code §§ 331.424(1)(a)(6), 602.1302, 602.1303,
602.11101  and 815.1 ( 2014). There is no statutory provision for state payment of sheriff's fees for service of subpoenas and other process
in state criminal cases where a dismissal is entered or defendant is acquitted; however, Iowa Code section 331.424(1)(a)(6) provides a
potential funding source for payment of these fees by a county. (Miller to Patton, 9-5- 2014)

*1 Mr. Dave Patton
*1 Buena  Vista County Attorney
*1 606 Geneseo  Street
*1 P.O. Box 1246
*1 Storm Lake, Iowa 50588

Dear Mr. Patton:
*1 You have requested an opinion from this office to determine the party responsible for payment of sheriffs fees incurred in serving trial
subpoenas,  court-ordered show cause notices in contempt actions, and notices for hearing in probation violations where these actions are
brought under state criminal law and the action is ultimately dismissed with court costs assessed to the state. You have included a State
Court Administration office directive dated July 20, 2011, instructing county clerks of court that sheriffs' subpoena service fees in criminal
cases where  costs have been taxed to the state shall not be paid from court funds, but rather should be zeroed out from the Iowa Court
Information System.

*1 As addressed  in State v McKinney, 756 N.W.2d 678 (Iowa 2008), the legislature reorganized the judicial system in 1983 to shift funding
for portions of the court system from the county to the state, and generally placing the responsibility for the cost of prosecutions under state
law with the state, and for costs of prosecutions of city or county ordinance crimes to the city or county. McKinney, at 680-82 (discussing
provisions of the court reorganization legislation contained in 1983 Iowa Acts ch. 186). McKinney sought to resolve an ambiguity regarding
the party responsible to pay fees for a material witness held in custody regarding a state criminal charge. Iowa Code section 815.6 provides
a fee to material witnesses held in criminal cases, but does not specify who pays these fees. In McKinney, the Iowa Supreme Court reviewed
several sections of the Code that specifically provide for state payment of witness fees in state law prosecutions - but do not specifically
exclude material witness fees - with other provisions requiring counties and cities to pay witness fees in criminal cases under local
ordinances. Id. at 681-82. The Court in McKinney found a general legislative intent for the state to pay costs in state law criminal actions and
for the city or county to pay such costs in local ordinance actions. The Court cited to this general legislative intent and found that several
statutes providing state payment of prosecution witness fees in state law criminal cases required state payment of material witness fees
arising from state law prosecutions. McKinney at 682.

*2 After review of the McKinney case and the prosecution cost statutes cited therein, we have concluded that the sheriffs fees for costs of
service of subpoenas and for service of notice of probation violations and show cause hearings in criminal cases brought under state law are
not payable by the state. We reach this conclusion by careful analysis of the scope of the cost provisions in these statutes and the funding
mechanisms   created for payment of these costs.

Costs  provisions

*2 Review of the following Code sections, also considered by the Iowa Supreme Court in McKinney, reveals that these statutes narrowly fix
responsibility for costs payable by the state in state law prosecutions to witness fees, jury fees and mileage. These statutes similarly require
cities and counties to pay witness fees and mileage in local ordinance prosecutions but also fix city and county responsibility for the broader
categories of court fees, court costs, and district court clerk services in local ordinance violations. See excerpts from Iowa Code §§
602.1302, 602.1303(7), 602.11101, and 815.13  below. In addition, counties are responsible for deposition and transcript costs in all criminal
cases- whether under local ordinance or state law. See excerpts from and section 815.13, below.

State-paid expenses   in state law cases

*2 the state shall assume responsibility for the costs of jury fees and mileage ... and ... the state shall assume the responsibility for and costs
of prosecution witness fees and other witness fees and mileage assessed against the prosecution in criminal actions prosecuted under state
law as provided in sections 622.69 and 622.72. (Emphasis added.)


*2 Iowa Code § 602.11101  ( 2014).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most