About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 The Revolution 1 (1870)

handle is hein.peggy/revol0006 and id is 1 raw text is: What therefore God

hath Jol <0   o    Q   twt0ct man Put asunder.

VOL. VI.--NO. 1.           NEW YORK, THURSDAY, JULY 7, 1870.              WHOLE NO. 131.

A PROBLEM.
4-
My darling has a merry eye,
And voice like silver bells:
How shall I win her, prithee, say-
By what magic spells ?
it I frown she shakes her head,
If I weep she smiles;
Time would fall me to recount
All her wilful wiles.
She flouts me so-she slings me so-
Yet will not let me stir-
In vain I try to pass her by,
• My little cicsnut bur.
When I yield to every whim
8he straight begins to pout.
Tell me Low to read my love,
How to find her outI
For flowers she gives me thistle blooms-
Her turtle doves are crows-
I am the groaning weather-vane,
And she the wind that blows.
My little love I My teazing love!
Was woman made for man-
A io;e that blossomed from his aide ?
Believe it-those who can.
I went to sleep-I'm sure of it-
Some luckless summer morn;
A rib was taken from my side,
And of it made a thorn.
But still I seek by some fend art
To link it to my life.
Come, solve my problem, married men!
Teach me to win my wife.
LoUlsa CHANDLER M ULTON.
MY CREED.
I HOLD that Christian grace abounds
Where charity :a seon ; that when
We climb to heaven, 'Ls on the rounds
Of love to men.
I hold all else named piety
A Bolfish scheme, a vain pretence.
Where centre is not, can there be
Circumference?
This I moreover hold, and dare
Affirm where'er my rhyme may go,
Whatever things be sweet or fair,
Love makes them so;
Whether it be the lullabies
That charm to rest the nestling bird,
Or that sweet confldenco of sighs,
And blushes without word;
Whether the dazzling and the flush
O softly sumptuous garden bowers,
Or by some cabin door or bush
-     Of ragged flowors.
'Tis not the white phylactery,
Nor stubborn fast, or s'ated prayers,
To make us saints; we judge the tree
By what it bears.

And when a man can live apart
From work, on theoloulo trut
; know the blood abhut his h'eart
Is dry as dust,
AL1011

I      .

GEORGE SAND AA1D TILE MARRIAGE
QUESTION.
BY EUGENE BENSON.
The extracts we have       given  from   her
novels sufficiently   show   the  lucid   intel-
ligence, the moral indignation, and the bold
affirmations of George Sand in the name and
interest of her sex. But lest they be set aside
as the language of her dramatic personages,
and as such, speaking from unreal or excep-
tional situations, we will reproduce hero some
passages from George Sand's admirable letter
to M Nisard. It is an eloquent and sustained
piece of writing, and serves well to give us a
just idea of the dignity and force of George
Sand as the advocate of her sex :
GEOGBE SAND TO A. M. NISARD.
Sir : There are very few criticisms that pay us for
accepting what is praiseworthy In them, or for rebuk-
ing what is erroneous in them. If I receive with grati-
tude what your criticism has of urbanity, and if I try to
oppose what it has of severity, it ts that I find in it, as
well as talent End light, a great fund of tolerance and
good faith.
If the question with me were one of satisfied vanity, I
hould have but thanks to offer you, lor you grant to
the imaginative part of my stories far more praise than
it deserves. But the more I am touched. by your suf-
frage, the more it is impossible for me to accept your
blame in certain respects. And it Is to exculpate my-
self-in spite of myself and contrary to my custom-that
I commit the impertinence of speaking of myself to one
whom I have not the honor to know.
You say that hatred of marriage is the aim of all
my books. Allow me to except from that number four
or five, among them Lelia, which you place in the num-
ber of pleadings against the social institution, and in
which I do not know that one word is said of it. Lelia
could also answer, among all my essays, to the reproach
that you 'address meof wishing to rehabilitate the ego-
tism of the senses, and to make metaphysics of matter.
Indiana, when I wrote it, did not appear to me to be an
apology for adultery. I believe in that novel, where there
is no adultery committed, if I remember it aright. the
lover-the king of my books as you witheringly call him
-has a worse role than the husband. The Intimate
Secretaryhas for its subject the sweetness of conjugal
fid-lity. Andrea is neither against marriage nor for
illicit love. Simon ends with marriage, and in Valentine,
of which the denouement is neither novel nor skilful,
the old fatality inervene to prevent the guilty woman
from enjoying, by a second marriage, the happiness for
which she had not known how to wait. In Leont it is-
no shore in play than in Manota Lescaut--for which I
tried, with a view purely artistic, to make a mate-
where a bold and frantic love for an unworthy object,
the servitude which a corrupted being imposes on a be-
Ing, blind in his weakness, Is not presented in its re-
suits in more engaging colors than in the novel of the
Abbe Provost. Jacques remains, then, the only one
which has been happy enough to receive from you some
attention, and it certainly deserves more than any work
of mine from a man as grave as you are.

book, but not always the fault of the author. As an ar-
tist he has grossly sinned ; his hand, without experi-
ence and without measure, has betrayed his thought ;
but as a man, he has not had the intention to mystify
the public, nor to adulterate the principles of eternal
good.
What I a:copt as completely true In your judgment
Is this : The ruin of husbands, suchas been the aim
of the works of George Sand.
Yes air, the ruin of husbands, such would have been
4ho object of my ambition had I felt the strength of be-
ing a reformer ; but if I have succeeded badly in mak-
ing myself understood, it is because I have not had that
force, and because I have in me more of the nature of a
poet, than of a legislator. I imagine, however, that the
novel, like comedy, is a school of life, where the abuses,
theiabsurdifies, theprejudica, the vices, of the time are
the domain of a censure susceptible of taking every
form. It has often happened to me to iiso the phrase
social laws instead of the italicized words above, and
I didn't dream one moment that there was danger in
doing it. Who could suppose me to have the intention
of remaking the laws of the country. I was astounded
*hen a few St. Sinmonians, conscientious philanthropists,
estimable and sincere seekers of the truth, asked me
what I would 'put in the place of husbands? I an-
swered them naively that it was marriage--in the same
way [as in the place of priests who had so much com.
promised religion', I believe we ought to place religion.
It is true that I have committed a great fault against
language, when, speaking of abuses, and absurdities,
and prejudices, and vices of society, I expressed myself
collectively and said society. I also have been wrong to
say so often marriage Instead of mareied persons. All
those who know me, little or much, have not mtstAken
my meaning, because they never dreamed that I meant
to remake the constitutional charter. I thought tho
public would occupy itself so little with my individual
self that no one would think of blaming me for
the use of words, or exercise over the life of a poor
poet, in the seclusion of his attic, a sort of nquisi.
tion, to  force  him  to justify his   actions, his
thoupits, his  beliefs, to maxe him    define  the
exact sense of expressions more or less vague, but
always placed, perhaps, so as to explain themselves. It
is possible that in this the public has not played a very
grave role, dud that the virile party pretending to be
outraged, yielded Itself to a little puerile gossip over a
subject littlo.,eWorthy of so sad an honor. But what is
certain is, that I have been wrong not to be perfectly
clear, prectaq, logical, correct. Alas, sir, I reproach
myselt every day with a very grave wrong, It is not to
be either Bossuet nor Montesquieu ; but, I confess to
you. I have little hope of correcting myself of it.
Another serious reproach that you address to me is
this ; It would be perhaps more heroic to whoever has
not a good lot, not to scandalize the world With his mis-
fortunes in making of a private case a social question,
etc.
The whole of this paragraph Is nobly thought and
nobly written. It Is not the sentiment expressed that
will find me rebellious. I place patience and abnega-
tion above everything, and I nawer nothing to what
concerns me personally in this reproach. Were I writ-
ing to a priest, perhaps the recital of a general confes-
slon would victoriously win absolution, at the same
time rebuke and penance. But there has been only Jean
Jacques who had the right to confess in pubhlc, therefore
I shall answer in a general manner.               ,

. It seems to me there is a great deal of protenosionto
abnegation and patience in the world. It 'Seems to me.
we do not live in an ago of independence and unlimited

It may be that Jacques proves all that you have found  pride ; I do not see that III uisi 1311o 1 ,0,. -- 1-1
iIt hostile to domestic order.  It Is tu that the very  vivid sentiment of their personal dignity, nor that they
Ippostiehas beon found in It, and etlter-tay be right, need be urged to bend both knees a little lower than
W     a book, however futile It may b,-does not prove  they do to- considerations and Interests which are
clearly; conoluvolvely, without; co  tatlon, and with-' nelther religaon, nor morality, nor order, nor virtue.
Oihworwhit it ams to pro vb. t1is  ' rut ok. tho: .Z to  B   01; iasO  o X do Nlot 400 that tho  w1 g 0? toa,
'/a .e

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most