About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

83 Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav 7 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/zbnazprv83 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                   ZBORNIK ZNANSTVENIH RAZPRAV - LXXXIII. LETNIK, 2023
                          LJUBLJANA LAw REVIEW, VOL. LXXJI, 2023
Ljubljana Law Review         Article reuse guidelines:                  n
2023, Vol. LXXXIII           sagepub.com/journals-permissions
© The Author(s) 2023         DOI:  10.1177/13882627221095105           SAGE
                             journals.sagepub.com/home/ejs


               Scientific article
               UDC:   347.9:340.1(438)
               DOI:   10.51940/2023.1.7-34


               Maciej   Wojciechowski'

               Interpretational Oppositions between the

               Majority Opinion of the Court and the

               Dissenting Opinion


     Abstract
     This article aims to identify the reasons for disagreement in interpretive judgments
  by examining selected cases from the Polish Supreme Administrative Court. The analysis
  focuses on the traditional triad of linguistic, systemic, and teleological interpretive can-
  ons. The study distinguishes interpretive disputes in a weak and strong sense (axiological
  disputes) and explores the utilisation of interpretive canons in the examined cases. The
  values used to characterise specific interpretive positions do not necessarily align with
  the intended purposes of the interpreted provisions. The analysis of opposing opinions,
  initially expected to reveal easily describable interpretive oppositions, proved challeng-
  ing due to the complex nature of argumentation used to justify positions. While classic
  opposition between  linguistic and teleological rationales was occasionally observed, it
  was difficult to discern such oppositions solely based on the justifications provided. In
  conclusion, the article tentatively posits that interpretive canons serve a more justificato-
  ry than heuristic function, providing limited explanation for occurrence of interpretive
  disagreements.

      Key words

      Canons of interpretation, judicial dissent, interpretive disagreement, legal argumen-
  tation, reasons for disagreement.


  University of Gdansk, maciej.wojciechowski@ug.edupl.


7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most