About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

131 Yale L.J. F. 1 (2021-2022)

handle is hein.journals/yljfor131 and id is 1 raw text is: 













THE  YALE  LAW   JOURNAL FORUM
MAY 31, 2021



Equal Supreme Court Access for Military Personnel:

An   Overdue Reform
Eugene   R. Fidell,  Brenner  M.  Fissell  & Philip  D.  Cave

ABSTRACT.   Federal law currently provides for direct Supreme Court review of criminal con-
victions from almost all American jurisdictions, but not of most court-martial convictions. For
them, an Article I court can veto access to the Supreme Court. This Essay argues for elimination
of that veto.

INTRODUCTION

    One might  think that every criminal defendant in the United States has a
right to seek review by the Supreme Court. But Congress has largely blocked the
path of a particular group of defendants: persons convicted at courts-martial.
This is because, under the Military Justice Act of 1983 (the 1983 Act),1 the only
court-martial convictions eligible for Supreme Court review are cases in which a
service Court of Criminal Appeals has affirmed a death sentence; cases certified
by one of the Judge Advocates General (JAG); extraordinary writ cases in which
relief has been granted; and cases granted discretionary review by the United
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), the highest court of the
military justice system.2
    In this Essay, we argue that the limitation on cases within CAAF's discretion-
ary jurisdiction, which account for the lion's share of that court's docket, is both
unconstitutional and bad policy. First, by delegating to CAAF, an Article I court,
the power to determine the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over appeals, Congress
violated the separation of powers. Second, in making a comparatively small class
of cases nonreviewable for the ostensible purpose of reducing the Supreme


1.  Pub. L. No. 98-209, 97 Stat. 1398 (1983).
2.  Id. § 1o.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most