About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

16 Yale J.L. & Tech. 1 (2013-2014)

handle is hein.journals/yjolt16 and id is 1 raw text is: CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THIRD PARTIES: PROTECTING READER PRIVACY IN THE AGE OF INTERMEDIARIES BJ Ard* 16 YALE J.L. & TECH. 1 (2013) ABSTRACT We often regulate actors as a proxy for protecting categories of information. Rather than directly protect reading records, for example, we target actors like libraries who are likely to possess them. This approach has proven increasingly untenable in the digital age, where the relevant actors are difficult to identify and constantly shifting. Unanticipated third parties now insert themselves as intermediaries or eavesdroppers in all manner of transactions, even in protected spaces like libraries. Where this happens, actor-defined regimes fail to vindicate their privacy commitments even within the institutions for which they were designed. Libraries provide a clear example of this problem. Private reading historically has been protected through a regime that restricts libraries' ability to exploit reading records. Yet this regime now fails to protect reading records even in libraries because it does not bind third parties who provide library services digitally. Illustrating the point, Amazon facilitates e-book lending for a number of public and academic libraries. Although Amazon collects detailed reading records from patrons utilizing these services, the library confidentiality regime does not restrict what it can do with the records. These patrons accordingly confront the risks to intellectual privacy the library regime was meant to counter. This Article proposes a content-defined approach whereby confidentiality obligations would attach to particular types of information regardless of which actors possessed it. Such an approach would not only save extant confidentiality regimes from obsolescence, but also provide a vehicle for extending privacy commitments to future data practices that implicated the same types of sensitive records. * Postdoctoral Associate in Law and Thomson Reuters Fellow at the Yale Law School Information Society Project. Yale Law School, J.D. 2010. I would like to thank Ian Ayres and Madhavi Sunder for their advice and encouragement during the early stages of this project, and Colin Agur, Valerie Belair-Gagnon, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Brookes Brown, Alan Hurst, Margot Kaminski, David Nimmer, Neil Richards, Christina Parajon Skinner, Andrew Tutt, and Bruce Wessel for sharing valuable insights as the project has evolved. I am also grateful to Mike DiRaimo, Max Mishkin, and their colleagues on the Yale Journal of Law and Technology for their assistance throughout the editing process. Finally, I would like to specially thank Lucas Franklin for sharing his in-depth knowledge of library ethics, privacy policies, and e-book lending. All errors are of course my own.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most