About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

46 Yale J. Int'l L. Online 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/yejloillwo46 and id is 1 raw text is: Features Essay Interest Rates and Human Rights: Reinterpreting Risk Premiums to Adjust the Financial Economy* Oliver Pahnecket and Juan Pablo Bohoslavskytt This Article proposes an innovative and human rights-based interpretation of interest rates applied to public and private loans where interest rate and risk premium are adjusted after the full payment of the principal. Risky borrowers pay more for the same loan than low-risk clients due to risk-weighted interest rates that are based on the absence or the quality of collateral. While this approach treats collateral and risk premium as exchangeable, it is only the collateral that is returned at the end of the contract; the risk premium is not. The practice of charging a risk premium on top of the prime rate is legally justified since it serves as a protection of the lender's property in a riskier environment by accelerating the return of the principal. But the Article argues that the price difference loses its economic and legal justification once the risk premium has fulfilled its purpose of ensuring the payment of the principal. Beyond that point, the risk premium becomes a form of discrimination based on economic status because it unjustifiably imposes a greater burden on risky clients than on low-risk clients. Additionally, the Article demonstrates that this risk premium cannot be a mere compensation that a risky borrower must pay for the lender's increased risk. Under this interpretation, adjusting the interest rate and the risk premium after the full payment of the principal is legally required because it prevents discrimination by securing the equal treatment of all borrowers once they have paid the principal. This argument is based on contract law, international human rights law, and international financial regulations. Furthermore, this approach would free resources in the current dramatic Covid-19 context where fiscal space and household incomes must be devoted to save lives and ensure that basic economic and social rights are realized. The authors wish to extend their gratitude for the comments to the drafts of this article received from Daniel Bradlow, Manuel Gonzalo Casas, David Kinley, Bruce Porter, Mihai Selegean and Balazs D. T6th. Chart by Johannes Hofer. They also thank Omar Shehabi and the Features team at the Yale Journal of International Law, who made invaluable edits and substantive contributions to this piece. t The author is a PhD candidate at Middlesex University, London, where he researches sovereign debt and human rights. TT The author was United Nations Independent Expert on debt and human rights from 2014-2020.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most