About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2020 Wis. L. Rev. Forward 101 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/wlron2020 and id is 1 raw text is: 












       IN   TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL WE TRUST: ETHICS AND
              BANKING IN THE ERA OF COVID-19


                         NIZAN   GESLEVICH PACKINt



                                  ABSTRACT



           The COVID-19   economic  crisis has brought to light something very
     broken in the American banking system-banks   prioritize their own profits
     over the interests of those they serve and interests of social justice. And they
     are permitted to do so because they do not owe a fiduciary duty to their
     customers and are not social welfare maximizing entities.
           In an effort to support the economy,  the US  government  passed
     numerous  stimulus acts, which included, among other things, a Paycheck
     Protection Program (PPP), and the distribution of relief checks to consumers.
     To  effectuate the massive distribution of liquidity on an expedited basis, the
     government  relied on big banks. But instead of prioritizing the public welfare,
     the banks were focused on their bottom lines and thus did not carry out the true
     intent of the stimulus. For example, with respect to the PPP, although the
     Small Business Administration was required to process the loans on a first-
     come, first-served basis, the banks were not. And absent that requirement, the
     banks  prioritized richer and bigger customers. As a result, women and
     minority-owned  small businesses, as well as peripheral area-based small
     businesses, found themselves facing more barriers to getting loans. Similarly,
     with respect to the direct distribution of relief checks to consumers, banks
     prioritized their own interests over those of their customers. For example, in
     an  effort to collect bank debt, banks froze and seized the funds from
     government  relief checks deposited into consumer  accounts before the
     consumers that needed those funds received them. Consequently, various state
     attorney generals and courts had to intervene, and mandate that the consumers
     be permitted to use the funds as the government had intended-for necessities
     like                 food                  and                  shelter.
           There are several techniques we can employ to modify banks' ethical
     behavior and  cultural norms. This Essay discusses such methods, which
     include (i) a top-down regulatory approach; (ii) the creation of market-led
     initiatives; (iii) an interpretive fix, offered by the judicial system; and (iv) a
     public     criticism   and     shaming     semi-regulatory    approach.




                                INTRODUCTION


     During   the COVID-19 crisis, something has proven to be very broken
in the American   banking   system.  The  government needed and trusted the


tNizan Packin is an Associate Professor of Law at Baruch College, City University of New
York,  and an  Affiliated Faculty at Indiana University Bloomington's Program on
Governance of the Internet & Cybersecurity.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most