About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

94 Wash. L. Rev. Online 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/wlro94 and id is 1 raw text is: SAVE YOUR BREATH: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
OF THE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR REFUSING
BREATHALYZER TESTS IN THE WAKE OF
BIRCHFIELD V. NORTH DAKOTA
Kylie Fisher
Abstract: Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit
to testing of their blood alcohol concentration emerged in a number of states as a way to
better enforce implied consent statutes that require drivers submit to such testing. In
Birchfield v. North Dakota, the Supreme Court held that statutes that criminally punish
individuals for refusing a blood test were unconstitutional but upheld criminal refusal statutes
regarding breath tests. Much of the reasoning in the majority's opinion stemmed from a
shallow perception of the invasion that breath tests pose to individual privacy interests.
Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion noted that where search warrants are reasonably
available, a state's governmental interest in collecting evidence and promoting safety is
lower than the individual privacy interests at stake. This Comment is about post-Birchfield
strategies for challenging statutes that criminalize refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test.
This Comment approaches the issue from a novel, bottom-up approach that argues
individuals will be most successful in challenging criminal refusal statutes in state courts
under a substantive due process framework that implicates state constitutional rights. This
Comment also sheds light on the underreported and significant issue of criminally punishing
individuals whose language barriers or hearing impairments prevent them from fully
understanding the consequences of refusing a breath test. While drunk driving is undoubtedly
a severe problem that requires regulation, the goal should be to preserve fundamental liberty
interests with viable legal and policy alternatives that can effectively curb drunk driving
rates.

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most