About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

39 Windsor Y.B. Access Just. 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/windyrbaj39 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Bound   by Blame:  Sentencing,  Colonialism,  and  Fetal Alcohol  Spectrum   Disorder

Sarah-jane  Nussbaum*

        Gladue and  Ipeelee send important  messages  to judges, but messages  that have tensions
        within them  that  reflect the broader  tensions  of using  the  criminal law  system   to
        acknowledge  ongoing  state involvement in discrimination against Indigenous Peoples. The
        heart of the tension is that the criminal law system is built around assigning individual
        blame. I look closely at examples of judges struggling with inadequate tools to follow the
        Supreme  Court of Canada's  guidelines to acknowledge  and redress the harmful impacts  of
        colonialism within the constraints of their job of assigning individual blame. The result,
        unfortunately, is a consistent failure to recognize the Canadian  state's ongoing  role in
        colonial oppression. This  article explores these tensions in the context of a particular
        manifestation: the judicial practice of blaming Indigenous  mothers  for the fetal alcohol
        spectrum disorder  affecting their accused sons. The analysis illuminates the depth of the
        tensions of a common   law criminal justice system  in a colonial state: in the process of
        sentencing Indigenous offenders living with FA SD, judges both strongly contest, and subtly
        rely upon, harmful colonial logics. I propose that a standing to blame analysis could assist
        judges in identifying, and responding to, the state's own role in causing, or being complicit
        in, an Indigenous individual's experiences of injustice. When the state has played such a
        role, the state is notjustified in blaming the individual through the criminal law. The benefit
        of this kind of approach is that it would highlight the inappropriateness of the state's use
        of individual blame   to respond  to harms   arising in  the context  of colonialism  and
        inequality.

        Les arrets Gladue   et Ipeelee envoient  des  messages  importants  aux  juges, mais  ces
        messages  sont empreints de  tensions. En effet, ils traduisent les graves problkmes lids a

*   Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of New Brunswick. This article is adapted from, and builds on, portions
    of my doctoral dissertation, which I wrote as a PhD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. I am
    deeply grateful to the members of my supervisory committee-Frangois Tanguay-Renaud, Benjamin Berger, and
    Jennifer Nedelsky-for their exceptional support and invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this work. For insightful,
    thoughtful, and helpful comments during my PhD defence, I am also deeply grateful to Debra Parkes, Carmela
    Murdocca, and Jeffery Hewitt. I also thank Sonia Lawrence, Vincent Chiao, Danardo Jones, Rahina Zarma, Dana
    Phillips, Asma Atique, Caitlin Murphy, and Sarah Buhler for helpful comments and conversations, and I am grateful to
    the two anonymous peer reviewers for their excellent comments and suggestions. Thank you as well to the editorial team
    of this journal for their thoughtful work. I presented earlier versions of this article at the Canadian Law and Society
    Association's Annual Meeting in 2019 and at the Early Career Feminist Workshop, hosted by the Centre for Feminist
    Legal Studies UBC and Canadian Centre for Legal Innovation in Sexual Assault Response in 2022, and I am grateful to
    the organizers and participants. For helpful comments at these events, I thank David Milward, Jillian Rogin, Sarah
    Burningham, Lisa Kelly, Tess Sheldon, and Kim Brooks. I also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the
    Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship, York University's Elia Scholars
    Program and Susan Mann Dissertation Scholarship, Osgoode's Harley D. Hallett Scholarship, and the E.M. Culliton
    Scholarship administered by the Law Society of Saskatchewan.


(2023) 39 Windsor   Y B Access  Just


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most