About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

38 Willamette L. Rev. 367 (2002)
Politicizing State Judicial Elections: A Threat to Judicial Independence

handle is hein.journals/willr38 and id is 377 raw text is: POLITICIZING STATE JUDICIAL ELECTIONS: A THREAT TO JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE PAUL J. DE MUNIZ* I. INTRODUCTION For 143 years, Oregonians have selected the justices of the Oregon Supreme Court by popular election.' From 1859 until 1931, judicial elections were partisan affairs between candidates from each of the major political parties.2 However, in 1931 the legislature mandated nonpartisan judicial elections.' With the ad- vent of nonpartisan judicial elections, there have been relatively few contested supreme court elections and, until the late 1990s, those that did occur, with some notable exceptions, were fairly mundane affairs. In the contested races that have occurred, candidates gener- ally have followed the judicial conduct rules that forbid them from commenting publicly about how they would rule on cases involving contentious social, political and legal issues of the day.' Generally, adherence to those rules has resulted in judicial candi- dates refusing to discuss publicly their personal views on subjects like abortion, the death penalty, and gun rights. However, in the decade of the 1990s, special interest groups throughout the country realized that social, political, business, and environmental issues decided by elected state supreme court judges were too important to ignore. The outcome of court deci- sions, the groups reasoned, could and should be influenced through support for candidates who were likely to rule favorably * Justice, Oregon Supreme Court; J.D., Willamette University College of Law, 1975; B.S., Portland State University, 1972. The author acknowledges the contributions of Jason Montgomery, J.D. Candidate, Willamette University College of Law, 2002, in the preparation of this Article. 1. OR. CONST. art. VII, § 3, amended by OR. CONST. art. VII, § 1. 2. See, e.g., Bar Association Proceedings, 10 OR. L. REV. 74, 90 (1930). 3. 1931 Or. Laws ch. 607, 610. 4. See generally OREGON CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT JR 4-102(B) (2001).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most