About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

63 Wash. L. Rev. 221 (1988)
The Evaluation of Legal Scholarship

handle is hein.journals/washlr63 and id is 233 raw text is: THE EVALUATION OF LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
Philip C. Kissam*
all literature is to me me**
Gertrude Stein
Researchers, readers, academic committees, law school deans,
research agencies, and editors of publications frequently evaluate
works of legal scholarship. As manifest in the many writings on con-
temporary legal scholarship, this evaluation process has become more
contentious and less certain.' The immediate causes of this fragmenta-
tion are not difficult to determine. They include a new diversity in
types of legal scholarship,' the rising expectations of administrators
and promotion committees that law faculty publish often and in pres-
tigious places, a dramatic expansion in the quantity of legal scholar-
ship, and the consequent competition for publication in prestigious
journals and books.3
We have evaluated legal scholarship traditionally on an implicit
basis with unquestioned* assumptions about the values, purposes, and
methods of this scholarship. Typically, we assume that scholarship
should focus on legal doctrine, employ conventional methods of legal
analysis and argument, and be useful to practitioners, or at least to
appellate advocates and the courts.4 We also tend to evaluate scholar-
* Professor of Law, University of Kansas; B.A. 1963, Amherst College; LL.B. 1968, Yale
University. I am thankful to Sandy McKenzie, Peter Schanck, and Joan Wellman for their
helpful comments on drafts of this paper and to Laura Fine and Kathy Reavis for their research
assistance. Funds for this project were provided by the University of Kansas General Research
Fund and the Gensman Fund, University of Kansas School of Law.
** Letter from Gertrude Stein to Edmund Wilson (Mar. 10, 1923), in 1 THE LETTERS OF
GERTRUDE STEIN AND CARL VAN VECHTEN, 1913-35, at 88 n.1 (E. Bums ed. 1986).
1. See, eg., Carrington, Of Law and the River, 34 J. LEGAL EDUC. 222 (1984); Cramton,
The Most Remarkable Institution'. The American Law Review, 36 J. LEGAL EDUC. 1 (1986);
Fiss, The Death of the Law?, 72 CORNELL L. REV. 1 (1986); Nowak, Woe Unto You, Law
Reviewsl, 27 ARIz. L. REV. 317 (1985); Tushnet, Truth, Justice, and the American Way: An
Interpretation of Public Law Scholarship in the Seventies, 57 TEx. L. REV. 1307 (1979);
Hutchinson, Indiana Dworkin and Law's Empire (Book Review), 96 YALE L.J. 637 (1987).
2. See, eg., R. STEVENS, LAW SCHOOL: LEGAL EDUCATION IN AMERICA FROM THE 1850's
TO THE 1980's 270-75 (1983); American Legal Scholarship: Directions and Dilemmas, 33 J.
LEGAL EDUC. 403 (1983); Critical Legal Histories, 36 STAN. L. REV. 57 (1984); Legal
Scholarship: Its Nature and Purposes, 90 YALE L.J. 955 (1981).
3. See Kissam, The Decline of Law School Professionalism. 134 U. PA. L. REV. 251, 268-71
(1986).
4. See H. PACKER & T. EHRLICH, NEW DIRECTIONS IN LEGAL EDUCATION 32-33 (1972);
Maggs, Concerning the Extent to Which the Law Review Contributes to the Development of the
Law, 3 S. CAL. L. REV. 181, 183-84 (1930); Nowak, supra note 1, at 321-24; Rodell, Goodbye to

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most