About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2016 Rev. Universul Juridic 237 (2016)
Justice - Supreme Value Consecrated by the Constitution of Romania

handle is hein.journals/univjurid2 and id is 611 raw text is: 






     JUSTICE - SUPREME VALUE CONSECRATED BY THE CONSTITUTION
                                           OF   ROMANIA

                                 Tudorel  TOADER', Maricta SAFTA'

                                          e-mail: ttoaderguaic.ro


Abstract

Justice, as constitutional principle-value, signifies, firstly, a dimension of the Constitution, namely that of being a
righteous law, in the sense of settling the entire constitutional system on a foundation of fair and equitable rules,
designed to eliminate any aspirations to omnipotence and also to protect some fundamental values that, as a whole,
tend to the idea of social justice. Thus, justice is immanent in all constitutional norms and, therefore, landmark of
essence for their interpretation and application. The interpreter of the fundamental law, and moreover the Constitutional
Court, as a guarantor of its supremacy, is called to identify the most fair/equitable meaning and manner of application,
referring his action to the same supreme value - justice. Express recognition of justice as a value/principle in
constitutional review appears as a genuine factor of forming  a consciousness of justice, and thereby of
constitutionalization of law in preventive effect.


Key words: justice, general principles, constitutional review, Constitutional Court


      At the foundation of the fundamental law of
Romania  lie a number of general principles which,
according   to its  authors' theses,  define the
citizen's condition within the national collectivity,
in other words, the vital interests of the nation, as a
whole  (A. Jorgovan, The Odyssey  of Drafting the
Constitution, Vatra Romineasc6  Publishing House,
Tdrgu  Mureq,  1998, p.155). These  principles are
reflected in other constitutional norms developed,
in turn, in the infraconstitutional legislation.

          MATERIAL AND METHOD

      In the early years of the Constitutional Court
and  of  founding   the constitutional review   in
Romania,  both the court decisions and the separate
opinions offered by the constitutional judges have
expressed  concern  for  establishing the role of
constitutional norms  with character  of principle
within  constitutional review. Thus, it was  held,
among others, that the entire constitutional
regulation is subject to some  general principles,
illustrating the provisions of Article 1. para. (3) of
the fundamental  law, according to which Romania
is a rule of law, democratic  and  social state, in
which  human  dignity, the rights and freedoms of
citizens,  the  free   development    of   human
personality,  justice  and    political pluralism
represent supreme  values and are guaranteed. [....]
A  law  violating not only the  text, but also the


principles of the Constitution is unconstitutional.
[....]. It also has been distinguished between the
general principles, expressly regulated in Title I
of the Constitution, and the principles that emanate
from  the entire regulation of the fundamental law,
for  example  that of  the  separation of  powers
(expressly consecrated  through the constitutional
revision of 2003) or that of equal opportunities to
political parties (Dan Victor  Zldtescu, Separate
Opinion  from   Decision   73  of  4 June   1996,
published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part
I, no. 255 of 22  October  1996) and  which  were
both invoked  by the Constitutional Court, even if
they did not have a specific regulation.

     RESULTS AND CONSIDERATIONS

     Examining   the case law of the Constitutional
Court  in its dynamic evolution, one notices that,
over  time,  it has  often invoked   as basis  for
establishing  unconstitutionality  of   law,   the
principles contained in or deduced from  Article 1
of the Constitution, whose sense it explained and
developed, by interpretation in accordance with the
international human rights treaties to which
Romania   is a  party and  with  the case  law of
international courts called to guarantee them. On
other occasions, we  have  analyzed constitutional
loyalty  (T.Toader,  M.Safta,  The   Principle  of
Loyalty  in the Case  Law   of the  Constitutional


1 Rector of All. Cuza University in layi, Judge at the Constitutional Court of Romania
2 Titu Maiorescu University in Bucharest, First assistant magistrate at the Constitutional Court of Romania


237

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most