About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

12 UCLA J.L. & Tech. 1 (2008)

handle is hein.journals/ujlt12 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Spring  2008                     www.lawtechjournal.com                 Volume  12, Issue 1

UCLA Journal of Law & Technology




                                BEYOND EFFICIENCY:
         THE  TRANSFORMATION OF COURTS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY^

                                  Orna Rabinovich-Einy*

       This paper advances the notion that procedure should be restored to the high road from
which  it has been diverted in the last decades. In the 1960s and 70s, the traditional approach,
which  subordinated procedure  as ancillary to substance, was  replaced by  a much  richer
understanding of procedure's significance. But this trend was reversed largely as a result of the
drive for efficiency that has dominated the courts and their alternatives. One of the side effects of
this development has been the channeling of technology's impact on dispute resolution procedure
to what I term the efficiency paradigm.

       While the technological revolution of the recent decades has had a far reaching impact on
substantive legal arrangements and doctrines, it has had only a limited effect on procedure,
where  it has typically been neglected or narrowly viewed  as efficiency-enhancing. In this
fashion, procedure has been pushed back to its subsidiary role with regards to substance. This
paper  advances  a  more  comprehensive   view, which  underscores  the  potential of new
technologies to advance a wide range of procedural values (including efficiency) under a multi-
dimensional learning paradigm.

       These  themes are explored in the arena of digital technology in the courtroom and,
specifically, by focusing on a particular case study - that of the Israeli court computerization,
which is simultaneously caught up in the efficiency paradigm and creates the basis for a shift to
the alternative approach that is promoted in this article.














JOLT  assumes no responsibility for the correctness of citations to sources in Hebrew. Because English translations
are often unavailable, JOLT was unable to verify these sources.
* Assistant Professor, University of Haifa Faculty of Law. The article draws on a report prepared by the author for
the XIIJth World Congress of the International Association of Procedural Law, September 2007.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most