About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2019 U. Ill. L. Rev. Online 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/uilro2019 and id is 1 raw text is: 











RELIGIOUS PROFILING: WHEN

GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE

VIOLATES THE FIRST AND FOURTH

AMENDMENTS


                                                         Katelyn Ringrose*


                               INTRODUCTION

     Government surveillance has a long history in the United States, consist-
ently intertwined within the political landscape, with a deep and disparate im-
pact on religious minorities. English Separatists, before leaving for America on
ships like the Mayflower, were subject to surveillance by government spies af-
filiated with the Church of England.1 Government monitoring, however, did not
end in the Old World, and numerous American religious groups have since ex-
perienced persecution in the form of surveillance pressuring them to abandon
their beliefs out of fear and discomfort.2 Religious minorities that have been
affected by government monitoring include Fundamentalist Mormons who
have been subjected to both state and federal monitoring due to stigma sur-
rounding polygamy; the FBI's monitoring and attempted delegitimization of
Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. and other members of the black clergy;4 and
the 20th century surveillance of Jewish and Quaker communities.5 Following
the attacks on September l1th, 2001, however, no minority community has
been as deeply affected as American-Muslims.6
     With new technologies performing massive internet dragnets searching
for signs of extremism and radicalization in the hopes of preventing terrorism,
state sanctioned monitoring of religious groups has reached an unprecedented

    *  J.D. Candidate 2019, University of Notre Dame Law School.
    1. See generally John Coffey, A ticklish business: defining heresy and orthodoxy in the Puritan revolu-
tion, in HERESAY, LITERATURE AND POLITICS IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH CULTURE (D. Loewenstein and J.
Marshall, eds., 2006).
    2. Hassanv. City of N.Y., 804 F.3d 277 (3d Cir. 2015).
    3. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878).
    4. See Lerone Martin, Bureau Clergyman: How the FBI Colluded with an African American Televange-
list to Destroy Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 28 REL. & AM. CULTURE: J. INTERPRETATION 1 (2018).
    5. The Color of Surveillance: Government Monitoring of Religious Minorities, GEO. L. (2018), https:/
www.law.georgetown.edu/privacy-technology-center/events/color-of-surveillance-2018/.
    6. Ashley Moore, American Muslim Minorities. The Now Human Rights Struggle, HUMAN RIGHTS &
HUMAN          WELFARE          91         (2010),        available       at
https://www.du.edu/korbel/hrhw/researchdigest/minority/Muslim.pdf.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most