About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

71 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 2 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/ucladis71 and id is 1 raw text is: Executing Racial Justice Ian M. Kysel & G. Alex Sinha ABSTRACT The United States has failed to eliminate racial discrimination in the decades since ratifying the international human rights treaty that prohibits it. To its credit, the Biden administration (Administration) has attempted to center the fight for racial equity in the work of the executive branch. But President Biden's executive orders and agency action plans on racial justice omit any reference to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), even though the treaty imposes robust, binding duties and standards for the fight to end pervasive racism. As President Biden enters the final months of his term, facing a legislature hamstrung by partisan divide, the time is ripe for decisive executive action to implement the treaty. Writing against a background of governmental and scholarly neglect of the duty to implement even non-self-executing human rights treaties, this Essay proposes several novel strategies the Administration could pursue. These include paying careful attention (and making formal reference) to ICERD obligations in ongoing executive action on equity; updating existing executive branch nondiscrimination frameworks to take the ICERD into account; and formally requiring agency action, including rulemaking, to advance compliance with the ICERD. Such actions carry tangible benefits, including driving dialogue about the extent of U.S. compliance with international law and adding fodder to new agency and enforcement actions, particularly where the ICERD is more protective than existing domestic precedent. Decisive executive action on racial justice that honors U.S. treaty obligations would set an important precedent and leverage the utility of international standards for remedying human rights violations in the United States. AUTHOR Ian M. Kysel is Assistant Clinical Professor of Law, Cornell Law School and Non-Resident Fellow, Zolberg Institute on Migration and Mobility, New School for Social Research. G. Alex Sinha is Associate Professor, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. The authors contributed equally to this essay and are listed in alphabetical order. We are grateful to Gian Regina for excellent research assistance; to Jamil Dakwar, Allison Frankel, Anjana Malhotra, Alison Parker, and jasmine Sankofa for dialogue that contributed to the development of this essay; and to E. Tendayi Achiume and Martha F. Davis for thoughtful comments on earlier drafts. Finally, we thank the editors of the UCLA Law Review Discourse, in particular David Ceasar and Kitty Young, for contributions that sharpened our thinking during the review process. All errors are our own. 71 UCLA L. REV. Disc. 2 (2023)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most